From: Anonymous <anon@anon.efga.org>
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Message Hash: 96559e78dc40d94890b5be1751e1cbcb0bc9ae3ac22711fc77cee0f65f89dde2
Message ID: <66c42f70e423e616b75fbe950615bdc0@anon.efga.org>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1997-10-05 19:37:39 UTC
Raw Date: Mon, 6 Oct 1997 03:37:39 +0800
From: Anonymous <anon@anon.efga.org>
Date: Mon, 6 Oct 1997 03:37:39 +0800
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Subject: Re: Quor's cipher
Message-ID: <66c42f70e423e616b75fbe950615bdc0@anon.efga.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Antonomasia <ant@notatla.demon.co.uk> wrote:
> This cypher is constructed differently from RC4 or fish - not as simple as
> WAKE but broadly comparable to Sapphire II. I think I'll enlist the help
> of a search engine. It's more than likely there other things waiting to
> be done to this.
It seems to be roughly a cross between a stream cypher and a block cypher.
Search engine turned up absolutely nothing on this.
> Quor's friend 'nobody' has actually put some crypto on
> the list -let's see what we can do with/to it.
An actual crypto post on a cryptography list? How unusual.... ;-)
Return to October 1997
Return to “Anonymous <anon@anon.efga.org>”
1997-10-05 (Mon, 6 Oct 1997 03:37:39 +0800) - Re: Quor’s cipher - Anonymous <anon@anon.efga.org>