From: Anonymous <anon@anon.efga.org>
To: cypherpunks@cyberpass.net
Message Hash: aab81c83ceb5846fa9cca4dbbd037662820b7ecef2c3faf3fcab79815ba80f11
Message ID: <2f7a322aeda39b75b0d2ea5678b33459@anon.efga.org>
Reply To: <v03102800b05aaebebd1c@[17.219.102.47]>
UTC Datetime: 1997-10-05 11:26:39 UTC
Raw Date: Sun, 5 Oct 1997 19:26:39 +0800
From: Anonymous <anon@anon.efga.org>
Date: Sun, 5 Oct 1997 19:26:39 +0800
To: cypherpunks@cyberpass.net
Subject: Re: New PGP "Everything the FBI ever dreamed of"
In-Reply-To: <v03102800b05aaebebd1c@[17.219.102.47]>
Message-ID: <2f7a322aeda39b75b0d2ea5678b33459@anon.efga.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
http://simson.vineyard.net/clips/96.SJMN.PGPBusinessEdition.html
[...]
PRETTY LOOSE PRIVACY
[...]
Published: April 2, 1996
BY SIMSON L. GARFINKEL
[...]
Viacrypt, an Arizona company that sells the popular program Pretty
Good Privacy, or PGP, last month announced a new version tailored for
businesses. The new program allows companies to ''decrypt'' -- and
then read -- information sent to or received by employees without
their knowledge or consent.
[...]
An employee's right to privacy is nebulous at best. The Electronic
Communications Privacy Act of 1986 specifically allows companies to
monitor the electronic mail of their own employees.
That has not stopped Zimmermann from complaining loudly about the PGP
name being used in a product that allows someone other than the author
or the intended recipient access to information. Viacrypt owns the
licensing rights to sell the commercial versions of PGP.
''PGP does not stand for back doors,'' said Zimmermann. ''I don't mind
if they sell a program that has a back door in it, but they shouldn't
call it PGP.''
[...]
''If your employer can read your mail anytime he wants, without your
permission, that goes against the spirit of the PGP trademark,'' said
Zimmermann.
Return to October 1997
Return to ““William H. Geiger III” <whgiii@invweb.net>”