From: Jim Choate <ravage@ssz.com>
To: cypherpunks@ssz.com (Cypherpunks Distributed Remailer)
Message Hash: b0576a34e34dc38e2caa34c1de642eec73ed4392d6463b7d220b743ecdc8e3d0
Message ID: <199710261616.KAA00300@einstein.ssz.com>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1997-10-26 16:22:27 UTC
Raw Date: Mon, 27 Oct 1997 00:22:27 +0800
From: Jim Choate <ravage@ssz.com>
Date: Mon, 27 Oct 1997 00:22:27 +0800
To: cypherpunks@ssz.com (Cypherpunks Distributed Remailer)
Subject: Orthogonal
Message-ID: <199710261616.KAA00300@einstein.ssz.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text
Hi,
I believe the first definition for orthogonal is not the vector or Cartesian
definition but rather from geometry.
Where, for example, polygonal means a closed shape made up from many line
segments, orthogonal means a closed shape made from line segments at right
angles to each other. The simplest being the square.
DeCarte used the concept of ortho- to describe the relationship between the
axis of his measurement system, hence orthogonal. Strictly speaking
orthogonal is a misnomer and should be orthometric or 'measurements at right
angles'.
I am interested in how orthogonal obtained its variety of other meanings. I
run across it in linguistics, computer science, philosophy, etc. In most of
them it means some sort of pure or simple relationship. Unfortunately I
can't find any sort of description of how it got expanded this way.
____________________________________________________________________
| |
| The financial policy of the welfare state requires that there |
| be no way for the owners of wealth to protect themselves. |
| |
| -Alan Greenspan- |
| |
| _____ The Armadillo Group |
| ,::////;::-. Austin, Tx. USA |
| /:'///// ``::>/|/ http://www.ssz.com/ |
| .', |||| `/( e\ |
| -====~~mm-'`-```-mm --'- Jim Choate |
| ravage@ssz.com |
| 512-451-7087 |
|____________________________________________________________________|
Return to October 1997
Return to “Kent Crispin <kent@bywater.songbird.com>”