1997-10-29 - Re: Orthogonal (fwd)

Header Data

From: Mark Rogaski <wendigo@ne-wendigo.jabberwock.org>
To: ravage@ssz.com
Message Hash: b58ce267663fb6a2de9ec9d427b5fa97c8c55172f2d87b3f6f3e948028b51fc6
Message ID: <199710290728.CAA06565@deathstar.jabberwock.org>
Reply To: <199710290529.XAA11468@einstein.ssz.com>
UTC Datetime: 1997-10-29 07:58:46 UTC
Raw Date: Wed, 29 Oct 1997 15:58:46 +0800

Raw message

From: Mark Rogaski <wendigo@ne-wendigo.jabberwock.org>
Date: Wed, 29 Oct 1997 15:58:46 +0800
To: ravage@ssz.com
Subject: Re: Orthogonal (fwd)
In-Reply-To: <199710290529.XAA11468@einstein.ssz.com>
Message-ID: <199710290728.CAA06565@deathstar.jabberwock.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text



-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

An entity claiming to be Jim Choate wrote:

: 
: How did the word get there, NOT what the word means. I KNOW what and how
: to use the word.

I agree with Jim, we have shown WHAT orthogonal means to the fields of
programming languages, computer theory, and software engineering.  The
question is WHY it was adopted.


: 
: Some of you people are fucking worthless for anything other than baiting.

Oh, come now, any human has many uses if you put your mind to it.
A cheap, renewable replacement for ballistic test gelatin, maybe? ;)

Mark

- -- 
[] Mark Rogaski                   "That which does not kill me
[] wendigo@pobox.com                 only makes me stranger."

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: PGP for Personal Privacy 5.0
Charset: noconv

iQA/AwUBNFbloMHFI4kt/DQOEQJSAACeKYPsTTsdIkyWJmgBITIX+JBTGEUAoKfL
JyNmBdHK8OIM/qsNdzWA8T4q
=PB3c
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----






Thread