1997-10-31 - Re: democracy?! (Re: Terrorism is a NON-THREAT

Header Data

From: Tim Griffiths <T.G.Griffiths@exeter.ac.uk>
To: mark@unicorn.com
Message Hash: b6a6183bd6b628bbf7b9b184a18237c4a6ec099aa23d200a6cdea00a78dac4bc
Message ID: <43e6aee147%Tim@tim01.ex.ac.uk>
Reply To: <878300037.16771.193.133.230.33@unicorn.com>
UTC Datetime: 1997-10-31 12:44:47 UTC
Raw Date: Fri, 31 Oct 1997 20:44:47 +0800

Raw message

From: Tim Griffiths <T.G.Griffiths@exeter.ac.uk>
Date: Fri, 31 Oct 1997 20:44:47 +0800
To: mark@unicorn.com
Subject: Re: democracy?! (Re: Terrorism is a NON-THREAT
In-Reply-To: <878300037.16771.193.133.230.33@unicorn.com>
Message-ID: <43e6aee147%Tim@tim01.ex.ac.uk>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain



Mark wrote:
> 
> Jim Choate wrote:

> Indeed. Yet in a democracy, any two other members are assumed to know
> better than me, and any 51% to know better than the other 49%.
> 
> Democracy is merely the scoundrel's last attempt to maintain the divine
> right of kings by coverting it into the divine right of the elected. 
> 
> >Which means we should have the lowest number of incarcerated individuals
> >instead of the most.

Does it? Or does it mean that we potentially have 49% of the population
in jail for any particular act, deemed to be a crime by the remaining 51%?

Tim G.






Thread