1997-10-24 - Re: Proof IE4 not an OS, was Re: Bill Gates, the Bully Savior

Header Data

From: “Paul H. Merrill” <paulmerrill@acm.org>
To: James Love <love@cptech.org>
Message Hash: ba4ab39ea87427e1f7d1c12e44687d569a4924e8d45844dadd36d0ea1242aa89
Message ID: <34511B83.7EF4@acm.org>
Reply To: <v02140b0bb04c1c1277c7@[206.221.201.7]>
UTC Datetime: 1997-10-24 19:20:18 UTC
Raw Date: Sat, 25 Oct 1997 03:20:18 +0800

Raw message

From: "Paul H. Merrill" <paulmerrill@acm.org>
Date: Sat, 25 Oct 1997 03:20:18 +0800
To: James Love <love@cptech.org>
Subject: Re: Proof IE4 not an OS, was Re: Bill Gates, the Bully Savior
In-Reply-To: <v02140b0bb04c1c1277c7@[206.221.201.7]>
Message-ID: <34511B83.7EF4@acm.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain



James Love wrote:
> 
> Nifty comment by Michael McMain on JavaLobbyCafe@iceworld.org
> list:
> 
> --------------------------
> 
> A friend at work made an interesting point about MS's claim that IE4 is
> simply an OS extension and not an application.  All the DA has to do is
> turn on a Power Mac, start IE4, turn to MS and say "So what other parts
> of your OS run on the Macintosh exactly?".

The MS counter-assertion is not that IE is not a stand-alone piece of
software, just that it is a part of the OS.

(Personnally I can't stand it.)

PHM






Thread