From: Jim Choate <ravage@ssz.com>
To: cypherpunks@ssz.com (Cypherpunks Distributed Remailer)
Message Hash: bb89e00a43368813c349c465975d3aff401d3279d20ba59f73479c7ab724f44e
Message ID: <199710250107.UAA27027@einstein.ssz.com>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1997-10-25 00:56:27 UTC
Raw Date: Sat, 25 Oct 1997 08:56:27 +0800
From: Jim Choate <ravage@ssz.com>
Date: Sat, 25 Oct 1997 08:56:27 +0800
To: cypherpunks@ssz.com (Cypherpunks Distributed Remailer)
Subject: Re: CMR versus GAK? (fwd) > Right to monitor (fwd)
Message-ID: <199710250107.UAA27027@einstein.ssz.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text
Forwarded message:
> From: "William H. Geiger III" <whgiii@invweb.net>
> Date: Fri, 24 Oct 97 09:00:38 -0500
> Subject: Re: CMR versus GAK? (fwd) > Right to monitor
> >The bottem line is:
>
> >Does the owner of a resource have an inherent right to control that
> >resource and if so what are the boundaries?
>
> Yes, and the boundaries should be very few. Things like just because you
> own a hammer doesn't give you the right to hit people over the head. But
> as far as setting policies on how a resource can be used and what
> conditions must be met before using them it should be without limit. If
> you don't like it the don't use it and go get your own.
But what are the boundaries? How do you tell when a particular action has
crossed them?
> >Does the user of a resource have rights outside the purvue of the owner
> >of that resource and if so what are the boundaries?
>
> No they do not. If the user of a resource does not like the conditions set
> by the owner for the use of that resource then they should not use it.
They don't? What if the resource is a requirement for a normal life?
Is simple ownership a license to steal or abuse? How do you even describe
them in a general sense? What if the owner of a resource decides to change
the fair use policy? Shouldn't the user have a say in what those conditions
are? Is simply agreeing to be a user of a resource license for the owner to
use that dependency to manipulate the user?
No, your answers are better than the other persons but not by much.
____________________________________________________________________
| |
| The financial policy of the welfare state requires that there |
| be no way for the owners of wealth to protect themselves. |
| |
| -Alan Greenspan- |
| |
| _____ The Armadillo Group |
| ,::////;::-. Austin, Tx. USA |
| /:'///// ``::>/|/ http://www.ssz.com/ |
| .', |||| `/( e\ |
| -====~~mm-'`-```-mm --'- Jim Choate |
| ravage@ssz.com |
| 512-451-7087 |
|____________________________________________________________________|
Return to October 1997
Return to “Jim Choate <ravage@ssz.com>”
1997-10-25 (Sat, 25 Oct 1997 08:56:27 +0800) - Re: CMR versus GAK? (fwd) > Right to monitor (fwd) - Jim Choate <ravage@ssz.com>