From: mark@unicorn.com
To: stewarts@ix.netcom.com
Message Hash: ccc911b293372481cbba3be2cf1329a6f84a0458a357b0b60a2602a3f602ede8
Message ID: <878217099.27123.193.133.230.33@unicorn.com>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1997-10-30 13:17:43 UTC
Raw Date: Thu, 30 Oct 1997 21:17:43 +0800
From: mark@unicorn.com
Date: Thu, 30 Oct 1997 21:17:43 +0800
To: stewarts@ix.netcom.com
Subject: Re: PGP Employee on MKR
Message-ID: <878217099.27123.193.133.230.33@unicorn.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
stewarts@ix.netcom.com wrote:
> Not true - you can't implement CMR without a mail enforcer unless
> you can stop your employees from using non-CMR versions of PGP,
> which is nearly impossible.
No, you can't enforce corporate snooping without a mail enforcer. You can
meet the corporate demands which PGP claim to be supporting without a
mail enforcer. There's a difference.
The only real benefit of CMR over the alternate systems suggested is that
the corporation can snoop on all email sent to their employees. Yet PGP
Inc have claimed on several occasions that this is not their intention.
Odd, that.
Mark
Return to October 1997
Return to “mark@unicorn.com”