From: harka@nycmetro.com
To: CYPHERPUNKS@ssz.com
Message Hash: d2567e316722a816cdcca00d7d0630f5ba4399086cbadd4fd35b90ccd36ae8c0
Message ID: <199710251158.GAA28570@einstein.ssz.com>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1997-10-25 11:38:06 UTC
Raw Date: Sat, 25 Oct 1997 19:38:06 +0800
From: harka@nycmetro.com
Date: Sat, 25 Oct 1997 19:38:06 +0800
To: CYPHERPUNKS@ssz.com
Subject: Re: Saving money
Message-ID: <199710251158.GAA28570@einstein.ssz.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> At 10:00 PM -0700 10/24/97, harka@nycmetro.com wrote:
> While I am glad for your achievements, you have not addressed my
> point: all this doesn't apply to the larger mass of people.
-=> Quoting In:tcmay@got.net to Harka <=-
In> As I recall your point, it was that most people are a few weeks away
In> from running out of money and hence cannot change jobs readily. I was
In> saying that a small amount of self-discipline and sacrifice can quite
In> easily translate into having a few _months'_ worth of savings.
That may indeed work for some people, but the argument of
"self-discipline and sacrifice" usually goes overboard once people
_other than yourself_ are severely affected by that. "Sorry hun,
you can't have a new winter-coat. Mommy has to save enough money so
that she can choose the people she works for. And no...no christmas
this year either".
In> If they won't make these spending tradeoffs and have not even
In> a buffer sufficient to carry them through a month or two or
In> three, I say screw them.
How about you adopting a person/family of your choice instead and
providing them with enough startup-money, so that they can at least
make an realistic effort to work towards a position of becoming
financially independent themselves? :)
In> I won't support restrictions on what a company may do, when
In> perfectly legal,
Neither do I.
In> just because Joe Sixpack spent his paycheck on beer
or on his two daughters...
In> Or because Rawandala Brown spent her money on crack
or supporting her sick mother instead.
Your repeating of government-propaganda about the "abuse of the
welfare-system" etc. doesn't really cut it as an argument in a
discussion about the realism of having total financial independence
and the freedom of choices, that comes with it.
In> The Mormons teach self-reliance, and savings. So do other
In> religions and belief systems. Many of them urge their
In> followers to have money put aside for just these kinds of
In> situations.
While I am not a Mormon or whatever, I do believe in self-reliance
myself. But to argue, that everybody already _is_ self-reliant to
the degree of being able to freely choose your employer at any time
is factually incorrect. And that was the beginning of this
discussion.
[Grasshopper stuff deleted]
In> Don't you mean, in your world view:
In> If success is outlawed, only failures will succeed.
You don't have to start twisting my signature-file and implying
things, that were never written by anybody but your projections. :)
In> (I urge you to think about how your criticisms of the free
In> market fit this aphorism.)
I suggest in return you reconsidering the myth, that a free market
means equal opportunities and thus quick self-reliance for
everybody.
Ciao
Harka
/*************************************************************/
/* E-mail: harka(at)nycmetro.com (PGP-encrypted mail pref'd) */
/* PGP public key available upon request. [KeyID: 04174301] */
/* F-print: FD E4 F8 6D C1 6A 44 F5 28 9C 40 6E B8 94 78 E8 */
/*<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>*/
/* May there be peace in this world, may all anger dissolve */
/* and may all living beings find the way to happiness... */
/*************************************************************/
... Freedom is not a circumstance in life, it's a State of Mind!
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: 2.6.2
iQEVAgUBNFHX2jltEBIEF0MBAQFftAf/Q4bWgn1DJSz8THyW2VwpvfqXu0Df8uol
4+Kqdg8RRsiKeFiUCXG0h/Ab2IZJmYjYvj4ycI5+VqCReCd5YROckTLqih1K4tc4
t0ZnCwGMkwQF5pJ9rizEQnooo2NhLjW1Nj5zMTfHxYeSUtBUNFabd54Szgl485RC
CWTRnBDJJCHhdxcvBl2xy+RWbviJ0+DbCVnt/28YN/4cH/YQKQn05dSLVGP4dOUW
SZ4VrRqaD+mU/rmFV8oDNfkxSxwx4s4y1yG0WfSBE2XCQea3uzm9oR2ULFwo6vQD
iv0VBBM9x7V4Cl9fDBmi36BXDlZDweJtgUDzGolZq4FAcWQRUzxz4A==
=uJPQ
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
If encryption is outlawed, only outlaws will have encryption...
Return to October 1997
Return to “harka@nycmetro.com”