From: "William H. Geiger III" <whgiii@invweb.net>
Date: Thu, 23 Oct 1997 11:26:03 +0800
To: "Phillip M. Hallam-Baker" <hallam@ai.mit.edu>
Subject: Re: PGP, Inc.--What were they thinking?
In-Reply-To: <01bcdf5a$4a2d3a60$06060606@russell>
Message-ID: <199710230254.WAA18427@users.invweb.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain



In <01bcdf5a$4a2d3a60$06060606@russell>, on 10/22/97 
   at 10:20 PM, "Phillip M. Hallam-Baker" <hallam@ai.mit.edu> said:

>I really don't want to get into a standards flamewar, the point I'm
>making is that this is a bigger issue in the Enterprise market than key
>escrow at this point. Phil claims to have an RSA license, if he wants to
>go after the enterprise market he can support S/MIME.

Nothing personal Phil but that is the most brain dead sugestion I have
seen on this list in a long time. Well I can see that getting a paycheck
from Verisign hasn't tanted your viwes in favor of an inferior standard.

-- 
---------------------------------------------------------------
William H. Geiger III  http://www.amaranth.com/~whgiii
Geiger Consulting    Cooking With Warp 4.0

Author of E-Secure - PGP Front End for MR/2 Ice
PGP & MR/2 the only way for secure e-mail.
OS/2 PGP 2.6.3a at: http://www.amaranth.com/~whgiii/pgpmr2.html                        
---------------------------------------------------------------