1997-10-24 - Re: Singaporean control freaks & CMR
Header Data
From: lutz@taranis.iks-jena.de (Lutz Donnerhacke)
To: cypherpunks@algebra.com
Message Hash: d74851a0392e89da3cb2e3957689ca4330caa2d41a0cd19020f4c3a24dd9f69f
Message ID: <slrn650oln.oq.lutz@taranis.iks-jena.de>
Reply To: <cb7aef8839502ded654b6de27813cb63@anon.efga.org>
UTC Datetime: 1997-10-24 10:06:24 UTC
Raw Date: Fri, 24 Oct 1997 18:06:24 +0800
Raw message
From: lutz@taranis.iks-jena.de (Lutz Donnerhacke)
Date: Fri, 24 Oct 1997 18:06:24 +0800
To: cypherpunks@algebra.com
Subject: Re: Singaporean control freaks & CMR
In-Reply-To: <cb7aef8839502ded654b6de27813cb63@anon.efga.org>
Message-ID: <slrn650oln.oq.lutz@taranis.iks-jena.de>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
* Anonymous wrote:
>Do you understand the difference between transit times of a fraction
>of a second and of days or weeks? Does this suggest any differences in
>the need for recovery of encrypted data "in transit"?
>
>Not all communications are alike. The longer data spends "in transit"
>the more need there is for recovery features.
Right. Communication is 'in transit' from MUA to MUA. Stored messages on
MTAs are in transit.
Thread
Return to October 1997
- Return to “Adam Back <aba@dcs.ex.ac.uk>”
- Return to “Anonymous <anon@anon.efga.org>”
Return to “lutz@taranis.iks-jena.de (Lutz Donnerhacke)”
- 1997-10-23 (Fri, 24 Oct 1997 01:49:49 +0800) - Re: Singaporean control freaks & CMR - Anonymous <anon@anon.efga.org>
- 1997-10-24 (Fri, 24 Oct 1997 18:06:24 +0800) - Re: Singaporean control freaks & CMR - lutz@taranis.iks-jena.de (Lutz Donnerhacke)
- 1997-10-24 (Fri, 24 Oct 1997 23:31:41 +0800) - in transit = ? (Re: Singaporean control freaks & CMR) - Adam Back <aba@dcs.ex.ac.uk>