1997-10-09 - Re: Applying ``Crowds’’ idea to anonymous e-cash.

Header Data

From: Lucky Green <shamrock@netcom.com>
To: John Kelsey <kelsey@plnet.net>
Message Hash: d83259616c10768723cff8cede66d5153ed888d1a347a253ca5664d28d8d0450
Message ID: <Pine.SUN.3.91.971009115957.8860B-100000@netcom2>
Reply To: <199710091652.LAA14607@email.plnet.net>
UTC Datetime: 1997-10-09 19:08:51 UTC
Raw Date: Fri, 10 Oct 1997 03:08:51 +0800

Raw message

From: Lucky Green <shamrock@netcom.com>
Date: Fri, 10 Oct 1997 03:08:51 +0800
To: John Kelsey <kelsey@plnet.net>
Subject: Re: Applying ``Crowds'' idea to anonymous e-cash.
In-Reply-To: <199710091652.LAA14607@email.plnet.net>
Message-ID: <Pine.SUN.3.91.971009115957.8860B-100000@netcom2>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain



On Thu, 9 Oct 1997, John Kelsey wrote:
> 
> Crowds, for those who haven't seen it, is a way of
> giving web users partial anonymity by making it impossible
> to determine which member of some ``crowd'' of users did
> some action (such as requesting a document).  (This is a
> very rough summary--read the paper for the real analysis.)

Some people from MSFT proposed a similar concept at FC'97. As for its 
real life value, the legal term for such a system is "conspiracy".


-- Lucky Green <mailto:shamrock@netcom.com> PGP encrypted mail preferred






Thread