1997-10-31 - Re: Jim Bell sentencing delayed

Header Data

From: John Young <jya@pipeline.com>
To: Greg Broiles <gbroiles@netbox.com>
Message Hash: e298ccc7381b2039a04a33edb8924b7c139473594cda574fc38f8b758630b260
Message ID: <1.5.4.32.19971031120116.00c62d58@pop.pipeline.com>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1997-10-31 12:05:21 UTC
Raw Date: Fri, 31 Oct 1997 20:05:21 +0800

Raw message

From: John Young <jya@pipeline.com>
Date: Fri, 31 Oct 1997 20:05:21 +0800
To: Greg Broiles <gbroiles@netbox.com>
Subject: Re: Jim Bell sentencing delayed
Message-ID: <1.5.4.32.19971031120116.00c62d58@pop.pipeline.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain



Greg,

What's your take on repeated delay in Jim's sentencing:

1. A squeeze on Jim to finger co-conspirators.

2. Weak case, must use procedure to punish.

3. To let time served be the sentence.

4. Jim was up to something worse now being discovered
(like 5 below).

5. Jim is a secret gov agent, now feet up in Tacoma IRS 
laughing at those who fell for suckerbait, screwball AP 
written by IRS as a sting (a recent book package to Jim was 
returned marked "Not in Jail").

6. The court was hoodwinked by IRS, too, and the AUSA
is preparing an indictment of the stingers and federal defenders
and who knows who else that was in on it.

7. Secret Agent Jim is squealing on his double-crossing
secret agents, cutting a deal with whoever else is double-
crossing whomever. He's going down, they're going down,
we're going down, the whole country's going down; Up the
Revolution!






Thread