1997-10-01 - Re: Why? (fwd)

Header Data

From: Bill Frantz <frantz@netcom.com>
To: Jim Choate <cypherpunks@ssz.com (Cypherpunks Distributed Remailer)
Message Hash: e33a76dd0c365a304a5d66d605140e6117a18ac176ecf336f424f3dd83af69b6
Message ID: <v0300781bb05794da144e@[207.94.249.144]>
Reply To: <199710010249.VAA17613@einstein.ssz.com>
UTC Datetime: 1997-10-01 15:21:05 UTC
Raw Date: Wed, 1 Oct 1997 23:21:05 +0800

Raw message

From: Bill Frantz <frantz@netcom.com>
Date: Wed, 1 Oct 1997 23:21:05 +0800
To: Jim Choate <cypherpunks@ssz.com (Cypherpunks Distributed Remailer)
Subject: Re: Why? (fwd)
In-Reply-To: <199710010249.VAA17613@einstein.ssz.com>
Message-ID: <v0300781bb05794da144e@[207.94.249.144]>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain



At 7:49 PM -0700 9/30/97, Jim Choate wrote:
>My original question still stands, why would I or any other party choose to
>use an anonymous remailer for anything other than the original 3 items I
>mentioned previously.

Black Unicorn uses a nym to express opinions he expects his coworkers and
acquaintances would not like.  Anonymous remailers can be used for the same
purpose.  I have heard of people's posts being brought up in employment
interviews.  A rational person might want to express controversial opinions
anonymously.


-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Bill Frantz       | Internal surveillance      | Periwinkle -- Consulting
(408)356-8506     | helped make the USSR the   | 16345 Englewood Ave.
frantz@netcom.com | nation it is today.        | Los Gatos, CA 95032, USA







Thread