1997-10-07 - Re: Trademarking CypherSpace???

Header Data

From: Antonomasia <ant@notatla.demon.co.uk>
To: cypherpunks@ssz.com
Message Hash: f1952cf68ee150813e717c47635aaac62e8f216a31797ef7835b6d60d6a92070
Message ID: <199710062122.WAA03996@notatla.demon.co.uk>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1997-10-07 00:08:59 UTC
Raw Date: Tue, 7 Oct 1997 08:08:59 +0800

Raw message

From: Antonomasia <ant@notatla.demon.co.uk>
Date: Tue, 7 Oct 1997 08:08:59 +0800
To: cypherpunks@ssz.com
Subject: Re: Trademarking CypherSpace???
Message-ID: <199710062122.WAA03996@notatla.demon.co.uk>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain



Tim wrote:

> Seems to me I-Planet can't trademark a word which has been in usage by many
> of us for several years. What could they do, demand that we stop using a
> word we in all likelihood coined? Remove our old writings from the Web?

> I don't know about trademark law, and about whether "prior use" invalidates
> an attempted trademark.  It seems unrealistic for them to lay claim to a
> word someone else invented.


The Kodak disposable camera I have in front of me says

         "Kodak, Fun and Gold are trade marks."
and
           "(c) EASTMAN KODAK COMPANY, 1994"

while I have 361 references to Gold, dated 1611, and it was
very likely an old word then.  These trademark assertions are daft.

--
##############################################################
# Antonomasia   ant@notatla.demon.co.uk                      #
# See http://www.notatla.demon.co.uk/                        #
##############################################################






Thread