1997-11-19 - RE: Search engines and https

Header Data

From: Lucky Green <shamrock@cypherpunks.to>
To: Fisher Mark <FisherM@exch1.indy.tce.com>
Message Hash: 2582664e8295639baf57bfe5bc8ff8ebfc9c3875663ecc4dcd81f0670911db78
Message ID: <Pine.BSF.3.96.971119232115.12431D-100000@pakastelohi.cypherpunks.to>
Reply To: <2328C77FF9F2D011AE970000F84104A749344B@indyexch_fddi.indy.tce.com>
UTC Datetime: 1997-11-19 22:31:44 UTC
Raw Date: Thu, 20 Nov 1997 06:31:44 +0800

Raw message

From: Lucky Green <shamrock@cypherpunks.to>
Date: Thu, 20 Nov 1997 06:31:44 +0800
To: Fisher Mark <FisherM@exch1.indy.tce.com>
Subject: RE: Search engines and https
In-Reply-To: <2328C77FF9F2D011AE970000F84104A749344B@indyexch_fddi.indy.tce.com>
Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.3.96.971119232115.12431D-100000@pakastelohi.cypherpunks.to>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain



On Wed, 19 Nov 1997, Fisher Mark wrote:
> * Many of us find being your own Certificate Authority makes for greater
> security, as you never have to let your private keys out the door, but
> only recently have the tools for creating and maintaining Certificate
> Authorities and server certificates become really commercialized (i.e.
> GUI front ends, available from Netscape and Microsoft, etc.)

About private CA's: take a look at Xcert's Sentry. http://www.xcert.com/ 


-- Lucky Green <shamrock@cypherpunks.to> PGP v5 encrypted email preferred.
   "Tonga? Where the hell is Tonga? They have Cypherpunks there?"






Thread