From: Tim May <tcmay@got.net>
Date: Mon, 3 Nov 1997 06:13:28 +0800
To: cypherpunks@cyberpass.net
Subject: ISP is not an important part of identity
In-Reply-To: <3758d87f6140a14b69fb75dda10350ef@squirrel>
Message-ID: <v03102806b0829a6373be@[207.167.93.63]>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain



-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----

At 2:28 PM -0700 11/2/97, Secret Squirrel wrote:

>For that matter, I'm not sure the the e-mail address and user name are
>good things to associate with the key.  The e-mail address changes all
>the time.  The user name should be assigned by you as part of the
>authentication procedure, not by the person offering the key.
>
>Monty Cantsin
>Editor in Chief
>Smile Magazine


Yep, I get people asking me to "prove" that the "Tim May" who uses the
got.net ISP is the same "Tim May" as "tcmay@netcom.com," which got
associated with my original 1992 key generation.

I try to tell them, "I'm that same entity, whoever that is, if I can sign
messages with that key."

They somehow think the tcmay@netcom.com vs. tcmay@got.net dichotomy is
what's really important. I then ignore them.

- --Tim May


The Feds have shown their hand: they want a ban on domestic cryptography
- ---------:---------:---------:---------:---------:---------:---------:----
Timothy C. May              | Crypto Anarchy: encryption, digital money,
ComSec 3DES:   408-728-0152 | anonymous networks, digital pseudonyms, zero
W.A.S.T.E.: Corralitos, CA  | knowledge, reputations, information markets,
Higher Power: 2^2,976,221   | black markets, collapse of governments.
"National borders aren't even speed bumps on the information superhighway."



-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: PGP for Personal Privacy 5.0
Charset: noconv

iQCVAwUBNFzqzFZizdRU50g/AQEbRAP/ahe8DCgMvWi1R5AkP5209LhMfrHbNKaZ
IsMOn3qt4FrwMwZBDR+RGlqn9tou4YHy5yAtvX7LLTFsyIA9bWLOrFXke+DT3cGu
sVuoIbUfr4oj8j9ttG9C03yUssewV5is3Mx9cvo1ZNwzXmX2NhwLLO/egf8UWndE
lipqOsXus98=
=9/Pf
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----