1997-11-26 - Re: Microsoft’s compelled speech, compelled marketing

Header Data

From: Glenn Hauman <hauman@bb.com>
To: Declan McCullagh <cypherpunks@toad.com
Message Hash: 2a51f902da976d2bf7cd9a22f40ffd51e52a417049e36d20c9d5ce127a888ed7
Message ID: <v03007801b0a13368fd09@[166.84.212.167]>
Reply To: <347AF2E5.CD900646@cptech.org>
UTC Datetime: 1997-11-26 03:17:24 UTC
Raw Date: Wed, 26 Nov 1997 11:17:24 +0800

Raw message

From: Glenn Hauman <hauman@bb.com>
Date: Wed, 26 Nov 1997 11:17:24 +0800
To: Declan McCullagh <cypherpunks@toad.com
Subject: Re: Microsoft's compelled speech, compelled marketing
In-Reply-To: <347AF2E5.CD900646@cptech.org>
Message-ID: <v03007801b0a13368fd09@[166.84.212.167]>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain



At 12:40 PM -0500 11/25/97, Declan McCullagh wrote:

>Former NY Times and Newseek reporter David Burnham writes in his book about
>the Justice Department: "The record is clear. Political campaign
>contributions, personal bribes and other direct and indirect favors have
>frequently influenced important Justice Department disions about the
>enforcement of law... Virtually every administration has demanded that the
>Justice Department bend the law..."

Hold it-- are you suggesting that the DOJ is being restrained in going
after Microsoft? By who?


Best-- Glenn Hauman, BiblioBytes
       http://www.bb.com/







Thread