From: nobody@REPLAY.COM (Anonymous)
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Message Hash: 2d002d140c106ff9d7c249c74e6b4883515706315b03b17dd6dffb45256ad268
Message ID: <199711110231.DAA17119@basement.replay.com>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1997-11-11 02:48:59 UTC
Raw Date: Tue, 11 Nov 1997 10:48:59 +0800
From: nobody@REPLAY.COM (Anonymous)
Date: Tue, 11 Nov 1997 10:48:59 +0800
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Subject: Re: Bell vs. Woodward--justice?
Message-ID: <199711110231.DAA17119@basement.replay.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
MongerUnit #2347 writes:
>It was apparent to many Canadians that the au pair would be found guilty
>of having 'traditional British Reserve.' The American system of justice
>is nothing more than a dog-and-pony show, particularly in hi-profile
>cases. The dumb British kid was under some mistaken impression that
>the trial would be based on facts.
No doubt their decision to hire Barry Scheck was based on his quiet, gentle
demeanor in front of a jury.
Return to November 1997
Return to “nobody@REPLAY.COM (Anonymous)”
1997-11-11 (Tue, 11 Nov 1997 10:48:59 +0800) - Re: Bell vs. Woodward–justice? - nobody@REPLAY.COM (Anonymous)