From: Blanc <blancw@cnw.com>
To: cypherpunks@cyberpass.net
Message Hash: 2f45490af90bc580efbb3d2012711310d18536223ce9934b2374cde41b06d527
Message ID: <3.0.32.19971115222916.006bc088@cnw.com>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1997-11-16 09:54:08 UTC
Raw Date: Sun, 16 Nov 1997 17:54:08 +0800
From: Blanc <blancw@cnw.com>
Date: Sun, 16 Nov 1997 17:54:08 +0800
To: cypherpunks@cyberpass.net
Subject: Re: Mad as Hell
Message-ID: <3.0.32.19971115222916.006bc088@cnw.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Nerthus wrote:
>In many cases, State Sovereignty is just another phrase for the "Petty
>Bureaucrats Reempowerment Act": moral dictators hiding behind the flag
>of freedom.
>
>As for me, I'll take Individual Sovereignty over State Sovereignty on
>any day. The 9th Amendment states:
[....]
................................................................
The statement from Colorado Senator Charles Duke on the "10th Amendment
Sovereignty Resolution" was the first I'd heard of it, so I wasn't aware
that it was limited to a vision of smaller States over Larger States. I,
too, would prefer a showdown for a recognition of Individual Sovereignty,
distant as such a thing may seem in possibility. Only science fiction
authors and readers seem to be able to identify individuality out of a mass
of "social factors".
..
Blanc
Return to November 1997
Return to “Blanc <blancw@cnw.com>”
1997-11-16 (Sun, 16 Nov 1997 17:54:08 +0800) - Re: Mad as Hell - Blanc <blancw@cnw.com>