1997-11-16 - Re: Mad as Hell

Header Data

From: Blanc <blancw@cnw.com>
To: cypherpunks@cyberpass.net
Message Hash: 2f45490af90bc580efbb3d2012711310d18536223ce9934b2374cde41b06d527
Message ID: <3.0.32.19971115222916.006bc088@cnw.com>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1997-11-16 09:54:08 UTC
Raw Date: Sun, 16 Nov 1997 17:54:08 +0800

Raw message

From: Blanc <blancw@cnw.com>
Date: Sun, 16 Nov 1997 17:54:08 +0800
To: cypherpunks@cyberpass.net
Subject: Re: Mad as Hell
Message-ID: <3.0.32.19971115222916.006bc088@cnw.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain



Nerthus wrote:

>In many cases, State Sovereignty is just another phrase for the "Petty
>Bureaucrats Reempowerment Act": moral dictators hiding behind the flag
>of freedom.
>
>As for me, I'll take Individual Sovereignty over State Sovereignty on
>any day.  The 9th Amendment states: 
[....]
................................................................


The statement from Colorado Senator Charles Duke on the "10th Amendment
Sovereignty Resolution" was the first I'd heard of it, so I wasn't aware
that it was limited to a vision of smaller States over Larger States.   I,
too, would prefer a showdown for a recognition of  Individual Sovereignty,
distant as such a thing may seem in possibility.   Only science fiction
authors and readers seem to be able to identify individuality out of a mass
of "social factors".
    ..
Blanc






Thread