From: nobody@REPLAY.COM (Anonymous)
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Message Hash: 36068ed2209cdb5e618d306bedf4f76103ef6e1c61e9df691511478c04dad9db
Message ID: <199711112359.AAA07968@basement.replay.com>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1997-11-12 00:20:38 UTC
Raw Date: Wed, 12 Nov 1997 08:20:38 +0800
From: nobody@REPLAY.COM (Anonymous)
Date: Wed, 12 Nov 1997 08:20:38 +0800
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Subject: Re: 1st Ammendment Tossed in Paladin Case
Message-ID: <199711112359.AAA07968@basement.replay.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Tim May wrote:
> In the infamous "Twenty-Nine Palms" poll of soldiers, asking if troops
> would fire on civilians if ordered to carry out an order, the longer the
> soldier had been in the service, the less likely he was to say he would.
> (The context of this order is generally believed to be related to a
> Department of Defense involvement in the wholesale disarming of the
> population under a state of emergency, FEMA or U.N. orders, etc.)
Note that "Twenty-Nine Palms" was the military home/liason of those
involved in the INSLAW travesty. (Everyone _not_ working for the
Department of Justice who can say "Fuck You" to Congress and get away
with it, raise your hand.)
> This is consistent with the military retireds I know being _extremely_
> anti-government. Usually with a right-wing flavor, but then that is
> understandable.
It is a fact that we tend to narrow our range of perception when we
get involved in any cult/religion/organization and bestow some of our
own innate responsibility/authority upon them. Once separated from
the group, however, we then tend to regain more control over our
individual beliefs and values, whereupon we are more likely to recognize
where we stepped beyond or own moral/ethical values while caught up,
to whatever extent, in 'group mind.'
This has been discussed on the list (e.g. Declan goes to Washington!)
and, thankfully, we have a weird enough assortment of not-quite-normal
SubGenius Bizzaro CypherPundits to keep us pissing all over ourselves
and one another to make the possibility of us becoming dues-paying
members of the CypherSheeple Union a remote possibility.
A CypherPunk nuking DC would not be a tragedy. What would be a tragedy
would be if, after being asked "Why?", he or she turned around to ask
'the group', "Uuhhh...why did I do that, again? Hey! Where did everybody
go?"
Any physical war or revolution in the future will be largely dependent
upon the success of the parallel InfoWar designed to direct (or prevent)
the thinking of those who the government provides with weapons and
authority.
We need as many of them as possible to be smiling inwardly to
themselves
when they say, "My gun is loaded, Sarge...and I'm 'right behind' you,
all
the way."
LoadAndUnlockMonger
Return to November 1997
Return to “nobody@REPLAY.COM (Anonymous)”