1997-11-02 - Re:

Header Data

From: Jonathan Wienke <JonWienk@ix.netcom.com>
To: cypherpunks@cyberpass.net
Message Hash: 423b73f83ef7bfc25ea4fb92f4e143b324d86bce1a564ffab120a297db4bcc90
Message ID: <3.0.3.32.19971101201844.030ea1a8@popd.netcruiser>
Reply To: <199711020324.EAA29916@basement.replay.com>
UTC Datetime: 1997-11-02 04:54:28 UTC
Raw Date: Sun, 2 Nov 1997 12:54:28 +0800

Raw message

From: Jonathan Wienke <JonWienk@ix.netcom.com>
Date: Sun, 2 Nov 1997 12:54:28 +0800
To: cypherpunks@cyberpass.net
Subject: Re:
In-Reply-To: <199711020324.EAA29916@basement.replay.com>
Message-ID: <3.0.3.32.19971101201844.030ea1a8@popd.netcruiser>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Boundary..3986.1071713747.multipart/signed"

--Boundary..3986.1071713747.multipart/signed
Content-Type: text/plain
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

At 04:24 AM 11/2/97 +0100, Anonymous wrote:

>But now what? Please someone answer my questions
>about PGP - it appears that the 5.x versions are not
>compatible with the 2.x versions which came previous.
>Is this so? Also, the direction they seem to be
>heading is in providing more and more non-free
>GAKked product. But aren't the 2.x and 5.x versions
>freeware? If so, can't others - a group of 
>individuals - take that source code and build off
>of that? Piss on these assholes and their licensing
>fees. It was inevitable, anyway. They are a 
>corporation after all, and the corporations are 
>not on "our" sides.

PGP 5.x is interoperable with PGP 2.6.x as long as you confine yourself to
using PGP 2.6.x RSA keys.  When you encrypt a message to a mix of RSA
(2.6.x) and ElGamal (5.x) keys, you will get a message stating that if you
insist on encrypting to the ElGamal keys, then 2.6.x users will not be able
to read the message.

I agree that the licensing fees posted are outrageous, but at least PGP
Inc. did release the source code so you CAN live without their SDK if you
are willing to analyze it.  How many other companies release source code?
How many other companies release freeware products like PGP 5.0?  They have
to make a few bucks here and there to stay in business, although I think
they are pricing themselves out of the market with their SDK fees.

PGP Inc. is not the enemy, although maybe some of the folks there ought to
have their heads examined.  When they implement mandatory CMR/GMR/GAK and
stop releasing source code, then I will throw rocks, too.  Until then, I
will continue to use their products, and sit on my high horse and laugh at
their marketing folks...


Jonathan Wienke

PGP Key Fingerprints:
7484 2FB7 7588 ACD1  3A8F 778A 7407 2928
3312 6597 8258 9A9E D9FA  4878 C245 D245 EAA7 0DCC

"If ye love wealth greater than liberty, the tranquility of servitude
greater than the animating contest for freedom, go home from us in peace.
We seek not your counsel, nor your arms. Crouch down and lick the hand that
feeds you. May your chains set lightly upon you; and may posterity forget
that ye were our countrymen."
-- Samuel Adams

"Stupidity is the one arena of of human achievement where most people
fulfill their potential."
-- Jonathan Wienke

RSA export-o-matic:
print pack"C*",split/\D+/,`echo "16iII*o\U@{$/=$z;[(pop,pop,unpack"H*",<>
)]}\EsMsKsN0[lN*1lK[d2%Sa2/d0<X+d*lMLa^*lN%0]dsXx++lMlN/dsM0<J]dsJxp"|dc`

--Boundary..3986.1071713747.multipart/signed
Content-Type: application/octet-stream; name="pgp00001.pgp"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="pgp00001.pgp"
Content-Description: "PGP signature"

LS0tLS1CRUdJTiBQR1AgTUVTU0FHRS0tLS0tClZlcnNpb246IFBHUCBmb3Ig
QnVzaW5lc3MgU2VjdXJpdHkgNS41CgppUUEvQXdVQk5Gdi8zOEpGMGtYcXB3
M01FUUxkZ2dDZU0yQnJUd2owRlUrdU1CbzV4ai9LTS8ybjdNMEFuMngzClZy
STZvQ3NnTTkvK0w5WjVxeTBnaVhYdgo9YTNnWgotLS0tLUVORCBQR1AgTUVT
U0FHRS0tLS0tCg==
--Boundary..3986.1071713747.multipart/signed--




Thread