From: Ghost@workline.com
Date: Mon, 3 Nov 1997 17:01:11 -0800 (PST)
Subject: No Subject
Message-ID: <199711040101.RAA12149@toad.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


F <Ghost@workline.com>
R <cypherpunks@toad.com> (remote destination)
R <jlhoffm@ibm.net> (remote destination)
R <fight-censorship@vorlon.mit.edu> (remote destination)
X - Start
Received: by soi.hyperchat.com id 00e700 at Mon, 03 Nov 1997 17:58:33 -700 (Mountain Standard Time)
Message-ID: <345E731B.12@workline.com>
Date: Mon, 03 Nov 1997 19:58:03 -0500
From: Abstruse <abstruse@technologist.com>
X-Mailer: Mozilla 3.01 (Win95; I)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
CC: Jodi Hoffman <jlhoffm@ibm.net>, fight-censorship@vorlon.mit.edu
Subject: Re: Why porn must be stopped at all costs, by Jodi Hoffman
References: <199711032057.MAA08856@k2.brigadoon.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

> Someone on this list, I forget who, has made numerous attempts at
> convincing us that pornography 'does no harm' to children.  It is
> exactly at this point that I must draw a line. Studies have shown that
> an event which lasts even so much as three-tenths of a second, within
> five to ten minutes has produced a structural change in the brain.
> Exposure to porn causes actual brain damage, especially in a child.

let me guess . . . scientology? it sounds to me as if you just despise
porn so much that you're seeing red, and hence . . . not seeing the
facts straight (or believing whatever you [want to] hear).