1997-11-06 - PGP’s SMTP enforcer and ISPs

Header Data

From: phelix@vallnet.com
To: cypherpunks@Algebra.COM
Message Hash: 4a4a2017098b02ba6293e57c2b3625f3e0c6b0f90730120688f83712bf85e0be
Message ID: <346647dc.118322082@128.2.84.191>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1997-11-06 04:52:42 UTC
Raw Date: Thu, 6 Nov 1997 12:52:42 +0800

Raw message

From: phelix@vallnet.com
Date: Thu, 6 Nov 1997 12:52:42 +0800
To: cypherpunks@Algebra.COM
Subject: PGP's SMTP enforcer and ISPs
Message-ID: <346647dc.118322082@128.2.84.191>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain



Recently, my ISP became the victim of spammers.  Their response, like many
other ISPs, is to block port 25 for all their dialup users.  This means
that all outgoing email must be routed through their mail server.

Now that PGP has an SMTP enforcers, and that others will eventually follow
with a S/MIME equivalent, we are literally an executive order away from an
effective (if not 100% complete) ban on "inappropriate" encryption on email
communications.

All it would take is a national emergency, like the next war against Saddam
Hussein, or a law that does not treat ISPs like common carriers and holds
them liable for what their users do.  

And the worst thing of all is that most people won't even notice it.  Hell,
I was the only person on my end to notice that my ISP had blocked port 25.

-- Phelix, "perfect paranoia is perfect awareness"






Thread