From: Declan McCullagh <declan@well.com>
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Message Hash: 6aa0928685697675258cb4396fe31baf04121829d1033da1631e15f909ee239d
Message ID: <v03007801b09f6380288a@[204.179.142.80]>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1997-11-24 17:59:07 UTC
Raw Date: Tue, 25 Nov 1997 01:59:07 +0800
From: Declan McCullagh <declan@well.com>
Date: Tue, 25 Nov 1997 01:59:07 +0800
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Subject: Anonymity at any cost, from The Netly News
Message-ID: <v03007801b09f6380288a@[204.179.142.80]>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
*********
http://cgi.pathfinder.com/netly/opinion/0,1042,1594,00.html
The Netly News (http://netlynews.com/)
November 24, 1997
Anonymity At Any Cost
by Declan McCullagh (declan@well.com)
When Lance Cottrell created an easy-to-use anonymous e-mail service
back in 1994, he feared that nobody would use it. "I used to be
worried that people didn't want anonymity enough to pay for it,"
he says. Today his company, Infonex, boasts 3,000 customers who
pay $60 a year to browse the Web without leaving behind digital
footprints.
Which leaves Cottrell with new and more troubling worries. The
mushrooming popularity of his Web-based "Anonymizer" (he also
offers a slower, free version) has placed him at the heart of
an explosive Internet debate over the limits of free speech and
privacy online. Is Infonex - or Cottrell personally - responsible
if a user breaks the law and can't be traced? Should the
government restrict anonymous remailers or untraceable Web
browsing?
Last weekend Cottrell and I joined 40 lawyers, technologists and
academics at a conference sponsored by the American Association
for the Advancement of Science. Our charge: to puzzle through
some of the questions surrounding anonymous communication.
[...]
Return to November 1997
Return to “Declan McCullagh <declan@well.com>”
1997-11-24 (Tue, 25 Nov 1997 01:59:07 +0800) - Anonymity at any cost, from The Netly News - Declan McCullagh <declan@well.com>