1997-11-05 - Re: Taxing Churches for their views? Bad idea.

Header Data

From: nobody@REPLAY.COM (Anonymous)
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Message Hash: 6f4d318c03f9fb188c5c293e31390653b57640442ebea92dbf3ee42e41939ed0
Message ID: <199711050759.IAA26701@basement.replay.com>
Reply To: <199711050535.GAA12187@basement.replay.com>
UTC Datetime: 1997-11-05 08:15:54 UTC
Raw Date: Wed, 5 Nov 1997 16:15:54 +0800

Raw message

From: nobody@REPLAY.COM (Anonymous)
Date: Wed, 5 Nov 1997 16:15:54 +0800
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Subject: Re: Taxing Churches for their views? Bad idea.
In-Reply-To: <199711050535.GAA12187@basement.replay.com>
Message-ID: <199711050759.IAA26701@basement.replay.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain

some person wrote:

Anonymous wrote:
>>Also tax any church where the sermon is immediately followed by an orgy.
>Well, so much for the Church of the SubGenius. Of course, they already
>weren't tax-exempt, so it's kind of a moot point. The orgies are worth
>it. though.
>Can we at least tax the Scientologists, too? All that Reactive Mind shit
>makes me puke.

You know whats wierd? there are these people that think a virgin gave birth
to a guy, and this guy was the son of god! And get this, he was killed, and
came back to life! They based an entire religion on this!

Its amazing what people will believe.