1997-11-20 - Re: From the Files - Freeh and Flight 800

Header Data

From: Marc Rotenberg <rotenberg@epic.org>
To: “Vladimir Z. Nuri” <declan@well.com>
Message Hash: 728aa805be6a6eac00cad359364881c4a7ea5d62bfceb1c1785f7a1b0ec5a8d7
Message ID: <v03007800b098e6c94f4e@[207.172.96.252]>
Reply To: <Pine.GSO.3.95.971118140330.17258F-100000@well.com>
UTC Datetime: 1997-11-20 00:14:39 UTC
Raw Date: Thu, 20 Nov 1997 08:14:39 +0800

Raw message

From: Marc Rotenberg <rotenberg@epic.org>
Date: Thu, 20 Nov 1997 08:14:39 +0800
To: "Vladimir Z. Nuri" <declan@well.com>
Subject: Re: From the Files - Freeh and Flight 800
In-Reply-To: <Pine.GSO.3.95.971118140330.17258F-100000@well.com>
Message-ID: <v03007800b098e6c94f4e@[207.172.96.252]>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain




FWIW, Kallstrom spent much of his time at the press
conference this week debunking the missle theory.
The FBI's explanation for why so many eyewitnesses
appeared to see a missile approach the plane boils
down to this: observers, alerted by the explosion,
were actually observing a wing falling away from
the plane.

Marc.


At 11:14 PM -0000 11/19/97, Vladimir Z. Nuri wrote:
>I don't understand TCM's recent comments about Kallstrom
>doing a "good job" on proving or concluding that the airliner TWA800
>was not shot down or bombed.
>
>anyone who has followed anything written by Ian Goddard
>on the internet can only drop their mouth in disbelief.
>
>I urge anyone who wants more facts on the matter to look
>up Ian Goddard's web site on a search engine. there is
>a lot of really solid evidence, including extremely credible
>eyewitness accounts, that it was a MISSILE. whether it was
>from our own government or not is a question -- but I
>fail to see how any well-informed people cannot be aware
>of the foul, odiferous coverup by the FBI (which to me
>suggests it was a US military exercise)
>
>also see the book by James Sanders, "the downing of flight TWA800"--
>he had a confidential informant involved in the NTSB
>investigation.
>
>
>
>
>
>---------- Forwarded message ----------
>Date: Thu, 13 Nov 1997 12:37:04 -0500
>From: Marc Rotenberg <rotenberg@epic.org>
>To: rotenberg@epic.org
>Subject: From the Files - Freeh and Flight 800
>
>
>Today the FBI ended the TWA Flight 800 criminal probe. The FBI's
>lead investigator James Kallstrom said that the FBI found
>"absolutely no evidence" that the tragedy was the result of
>a criminal act.
>
>But what was the FBI telling Congress after the incident
>occurred? The following expert from CNN is worth saving.
>Keep in mind that the FBI Director was simultaneously
>lobbying the Judiciary Committee for expanded wiretap
>authority.
>
>Marc.
>
>
>>From the CNN, July 20, 1996
>[http://cnn.com/US/9607/20/twa.crash.probe/index.html]
>
>U.S. Sen. Orrin Hatch, R-Utah, who was among members of Congress briefed
>Friday by FBI Director Louis Freeh, said it looked "pretty darn conclusive"
>that
>either a bomb or a missile caused the explosion.
>
>"We're looking at a criminal act," Hatch said. "We're looking at somebody who
>either put a bomb on it or shot a missile, a surface-to-air missile."
>
>Hatch, chairman of the Judiciary Committee, told CNN he came to his
>conclusions
>after "various conversations" with government officials.
>
>"I won't go so far as to say it was terrorism, but there was sabotage
>here," Hatch
>said. "It looks like that."
>
>"It's very -- almost 100 percent unlikely -- that this was a mechanical
>failure," he
>said. "It looks pretty darn conclusive that it was an explosion caused either
>internally or externally that was caused by a criminal act."
>
> * * *



==================================================================
Marc Rotenberg, director                *   +1 202 544 9240 (tel)
Electronic Privacy Information Center   *   +1 202 547 5482 (fax)
666 Pennsylvania Ave., SE Suite 301     *   rotenberg@epic.org
Washington, DC 20003   USA              +   http://www.epic.org
==================================================================







Thread