1997-11-23 - Re: Report on UN conference on Internet and racism

Header Data

From: Mikhael Frieden <mikhaelf@mindspring.com>
To: Tim May <declan@well.com>
Message Hash: 7b4b98c7d8e4747023d48b6eb1c656ccbd47a7d4de7e62db70321dc30044f16c
Message ID: <3.0.16.19971123050057.3ac79780@pop.mindspring.com>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1997-11-23 11:55:43 UTC
Raw Date: Sun, 23 Nov 1997 19:55:43 +0800

Raw message

From: Mikhael Frieden <mikhaelf@mindspring.com>
Date: Sun, 23 Nov 1997 19:55:43 +0800
To: Tim May <declan@well.com>
Subject: Re: Report on UN conference on Internet and racism
Message-ID: <3.0.16.19971123050057.3ac79780@pop.mindspring.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain



At 08:12 PM 11/18/97 -0700, Tim May wrote:
>At 10:34 PM -0700 11/18/97, Mikhael Frieden wrote:
>>At 06:53 PM 11/18/97 -0600, William H. Geiger III wrote:

>>>I think that there is plenty of case law of extending constutional
>>>protections to non-citizens. One that comes to mind were the rulings
>>>against California inwhich the courts ruled the they were obligated to
>>>provide schooling and social services to illegal aliens (a really fucked
>>>rulling IMNSHO but if some good can come out of it no sense not making use
>>>of it).

>>        In a much more fundamental sense, if they were not given
>>constitutional protections they really could be rounded up and bussed
>>across the border.

>And what would be wrong with this?

        Not a damned thing. While in this country they are in the act of
committing a crime. Once they have been deported they have stopped
committing the crime and then they can plead to appear in court. 

-=-=-
The 2nd guarantees all the rest. 






Thread