From: ulf@fitug.de (Ulf =?iso-8859-1?Q?M=F6ller?=)
Date: Tue, 4 Nov 1997 07:44:38 +0800
To: cypherpunks@Algebra.COM
Subject: Re: A Legal Strategy
In-Reply-To: <d055dda10a1a6e5d60cbd7a5914bcac6@squirrel>
Message-ID: <m0xSVv0-0003bcC@ulf.mali.sub.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain



Monty Cantsin writes:

>Now, you are in an interesting situation.  You can't give the
>passwords for half of the disks, but you are unable to prove this.
>This means you have nothing to gain by giving the pass phrase to the
>"Ulysses" disk - you will always be seen as holding out.  Even if you
>convince the Judge that some of the disks are noise, you have no
>reason not to include the "Ulysses" disk in this set.

Bryan Olson once discussed something like this in a sci.crypt post:
<URL:http://www.sevenlocks.com/papers/crypto/duress.txt>