From: John Young <jya@pipeline.com>
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Message Hash: 965657607b9b47879df47b2eda51efeb1d1f671f617a30f76715ca6d56691e60
Message ID: <1.5.4.32.19971106122235.00a31158@pop.pipeline.com>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1997-11-06 12:32:01 UTC
Raw Date: Thu, 6 Nov 1997 20:32:01 +0800
From: John Young <jya@pipeline.com>
Date: Thu, 6 Nov 1997 20:32:01 +0800
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Subject: Mitnick Rings Bell
Message-ID: <1.5.4.32.19971106122235.00a31158@pop.pipeline.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
6 November 1997, Digital Cellular Report:
U.S. government takes hard line on Mitnick. US Hacker Pleads for Help
A US 'hacker'- Kevin David Mitnick - has issued a plea for financial help to
fight his defence case through his lawyer, Donald C Randolph of Santa Monica,
USA. Through Randolph, Mitnick is claiming that the US government is
seeking to
make an example of him for the possession of unauthorised cellular access
codes.
The issue is particularly important in the North American market where
analogue,
rather than digital cellular, is the norm.
In one of the most amazing claims, Mitnick claims to have been kept in solitary
confinement for 23 hours a day, naked in a freezing air-conditioned cell
for eight
months and led to the showers in chains. Perhaps the most puzzling aspect
to the
whole case is the fact that while the US government has never sought to prove
that Mitnick profited from his 'hacking' activities - although he could
certainly have
done so by 'selling' stolen airtime to third parties. Instead they claim he
caused
losses in excess of $80 million. Kevin certainly appears to be paying the
price for
his nefarious deeds having already spent nearly two years in custody during
which
time he has been prohibited from any access to wireless communications
equipment, computer hardware or computer software. It's difficult to know
exactly which side is the more paranoid since Mitnick is claiming that his
fate is
part of a deliberate US government plot to divert scrutiny away from its plans
concerning the control and regulation of both telecommunications and the
Internet.
The case would seem to present a most powerful argument for the US to switch
more swiftly over to digital cellular where 'hacking' is far more difficult.
Return to November 1997
Return to “Rich Burroughs <rich@paranoid.org>”