From: nobody@REPLAY.COM (Anonymous)
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Message Hash: 9944ebfc879917a4e6a26ff4f269b3713a6fa11623c8902b6d6762a6ca5f2f78
Message ID: <199711022212.XAA19710@basement.replay.com>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1997-11-02 22:29:33 UTC
Raw Date: Mon, 3 Nov 1997 06:29:33 +0800
From: nobody@REPLAY.COM (Anonymous)
Date: Mon, 3 Nov 1997 06:29:33 +0800
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Subject: Re: Vote CypherPunk!
Message-ID: <199711022212.XAA19710@basement.replay.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
At 20:24 -0500 10/31/97, TruthMonger wrote:
>* In August, the Boston Globe profiled the Taiwan National
>Assembly (which specializes in constitutional issues), where it is
>fairly common for the minority New Party to filibuster by merely
>grabbing the microphone and physically restraining majority-party
>members so that they cannot call for votes. Fights break out,
>sometimes bloody ones. Said a local political science professor, "It
>may not be civilized, but it's efficient" because citizens respond by
>re-electing the aggressive legislators.
I'd probably have a lot more respect for Congresscritters if they cared
enough about any issue to physically fight about it. Maybe we could issue
them weapons, too; then term limits would become a moot point. (Who would
win if Jesse Helms and Diane Feinstein had a fight to the death? The
American citizens.)
A suitable quote from Monty Python:
We would like to apologize for the way politicians are
represented in this programme. It was never our intention to
imply that politicians are weak-kneed, political time-servers
who are concerned more with their personal vendettas and
private power struggles than the problems of government, nor
to suggest at any point that they sacrifice their credibility
by denying free debate on vital matters in the mistaken
impression that party unity comes before the well-being of
the people they supposedly represent, nor to imply at any
stage that they are squabbling little toadies without an
ounce of concern for the vital social problems of today. Nor
indeed do we intend that viewers should consider them as
crabby ulcerous self-seeking vermin with furry legs and an
addiction to alcohol and certain explicit sexual practices
which some people might find offensive. We are sorry if this
impression has come across.
In fact, they could run this at the top of every hour on C-SPAN. I'll call
my cable company.
Return to November 1997
Return to “nobody@REPLAY.COM (Anonymous)”