From: CypherPunks Press <cp@dev.null>
To: cypherpunks@cyberpass.net
Message Hash: aa6339275035d795d42060f6355690d711f4104b5cf0852e5efe5d7dab0d705c
Message ID: <347D5F77.5428@dev.null>
Reply To: <199711270525.GAA01200@basement.replay.com>
UTC Datetime: 1997-11-27 12:16:02 UTC
Raw Date: Thu, 27 Nov 1997 20:16:02 +0800
From: CypherPunks Press <cp@dev.null>
Date: Thu, 27 Nov 1997 20:16:02 +0800
To: cypherpunks@cyberpass.net
Subject: Re: Moderated vs. Unmoderated Lists
In-Reply-To: <199711270525.GAA01200@basement.replay.com>
Message-ID: <347D5F77.5428@dev.null>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Anonymous wrote:
>
> The issue is not moderation. It is whether this list has a focus, a
> central set of ideas, a reason for existence. If we're just going to
> talk about whatever anyone finds interesting, there is nothing to stop
> the list from drifting away from its goals.
Or from moving toward its ghouls!
> There is little discussion about cryptography any more.
OK, which one of you is the wise-guy who told Anonymous that he or
she can't send posts about cryptography to the list?
Anonymous (if that is your *real* name...), many of us on the list
have been anxiously awaiting a Savior to arrive on the list and begin
discussing cryptography.
We were hoping maybe it was you, but it looks like we were wrong
again.
StillWaitingMonger
Return to November 1997
Return to ““William H. Geiger III” <whgiii@invweb.net>”