From: “Robert A. Costner” <pooh@efga.org>
To: 3umoelle@informatik.uni-hamburg.de (Ulf Möller )
Message Hash: c529d12fa5bf64a25fc0db03311d4095ff0108def6fda1370e1fe2372da90438
Message ID: <3.0.3.32.19971108202227.0353aeec@mail.atl.bellsouth.net>
Reply To: <3463E8AC.3F54BC7E@systemics.com>
UTC Datetime: 1997-11-09 01:37:17 UTC
Raw Date: Sun, 9 Nov 1997 09:37:17 +0800
From: "Robert A. Costner" <pooh@efga.org>
Date: Sun, 9 Nov 1997 09:37:17 +0800
To: 3umoelle@informatik.uni-hamburg.de (Ulf Möller )
Subject: Re: [SURVEY try again] pgp5.x / pgp2.x users
In-Reply-To: <3463E8AC.3F54BC7E@systemics.com>
Message-ID: <3.0.3.32.19971108202227.0353aeec@mail.atl.bellsouth.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
At 12:23 AM 11/9/97 +0100, Ulf Möller wrote:
>> > 20 % of the users who have posted digitally signed messages that are
>> > available in my news spool (international and local newsgroups and
>> > mailing lists) use PGP 5. The sample contains 545 unique e-mail
>> > addresses. YMMV.
Just to skew the numbers, I for instance have PGP 5.0 but am using a 2.6.2
DOS generated key that is RSA, not DSS. Grepping would show me to be PGP5.x,
which perhaps technically I am, but my key is really 2.x
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: PGP for Personal Privacy 5.0
Charset: noconv
iQBVAwUBNGUQUEGpGhRXg5NZAQF7fQH5AfV2VfTwuLYs1ND6UTwoWIzAf3OjTSA8
saBlUQJquCUotwr5zk3cU+KiJJ9/hgLsLzOfet16ow1Do3zop7zUJw==
=VDPv
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
-- Robert Costner Phone: (770) 512-8746
Electronic Frontiers Georgia mailto:pooh@efga.org
http://www.efga.org/ run PGP 5.0 for my public key
Return to November 1997
Return to ““Robert A. Costner” <pooh@efga.org>”
Unknown thread root