1997-11-15 - Re: Y2K: Canada status?
Header Data
From: Rabid Wombat <wombat@mcfeely.bsfs.org>
To: Bill Stewart <stewarts@ix.netcom.com>
Message Hash: cf21f0bdca7b506bde812ea1dd04661070b1cf5de87a6eb5e366735d26866579
Message ID: <Pine.BSF.3.91.971115125453.20901C-100000@mcfeely.bsfs.org>
Reply To: <3.0.3.32.19971114110336.00716324@popd.ix.netcom.com>
UTC Datetime: 1997-11-15 19:22:48 UTC
Raw Date: Sun, 16 Nov 1997 03:22:48 +0800
Raw message
From: Rabid Wombat <wombat@mcfeely.bsfs.org>
Date: Sun, 16 Nov 1997 03:22:48 +0800
To: Bill Stewart <stewarts@ix.netcom.com>
Subject: Re: Y2K: Canada status?
In-Reply-To: <3.0.3.32.19971114110336.00716324@popd.ix.netcom.com>
Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.3.91.971115125453.20901C-100000@mcfeely.bsfs.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
On Fri, 14 Nov 1997, Bill Stewart wrote:
> At 07:22 PM 11/11/1997 -0500, Jean-Francois Avon wrote:
> >Please reply to my personnal address, I am not on CPunks.
> >
> >Is there anybody who knows about the Y2K situation in Canada?
>
> Canada is expected to remain relatively intact until 2000 :-)
Don't be ridiculous; everybody knows that Canada uses metric dates, and
won't have a probelm until the year 10,000.
;)
Thread
Return to November 1997
- Return to “Bill Stewart <stewarts@ix.netcom.com>”
- Return to ““Jean-Francois Avon” <jf_avon@citenet.net>”
Return to “Rabid Wombat <wombat@mcfeely.bsfs.org>”
- 1997-11-12 (Wed, 12 Nov 1997 11:28:44 +0800) - Y2K: Canada status? - “Jean-Francois Avon” <jf_avon@citenet.net>
- 1997-11-14 (Sat, 15 Nov 1997 03:41:56 +0800) - Re: Y2K: Canada status? - Bill Stewart <stewarts@ix.netcom.com>
- 1997-11-15 (Sun, 16 Nov 1997 03:22:48 +0800) - Re: Y2K: Canada status? - Rabid Wombat <wombat@mcfeely.bsfs.org>
- 1997-11-14 (Sat, 15 Nov 1997 03:41:56 +0800) - Re: Y2K: Canada status? - Bill Stewart <stewarts@ix.netcom.com>