From: lcs Mixmaster Remailer <mix@anon.lcs.mit.edu>
Date: Tue, 25 Nov 1997 11:13:49 +0800
To: mail2news@myriad.alias.net
Subject: "Good job NANAE. You really fucked up royally." (was: Furor over Spam)
In-Reply-To: <657kr7$rv@clarknet.clark.net>
Message-ID: <19971125030000.27436.qmail@nym.alias.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain



tweek@netcom.com (R R M Tweek) wrote:
 
> I think it's fucking funny if you ask me.  The unworthy "databasix goons"
                                                          ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
> were concerned just about this sort of thing occuring.  

Isn't it amazing how they can "predict" thing like that?

> I hope that  
> LOA was running some sort of caller ID, or supeonas the phone records
> of those calls who step across the line and made threats in their 4am
> phone calls.  Can't wait to see how this story sways the congresscritters
> when Sanford tries to spin this incident his was in the anti-spam legislation
> hearings.  

Maybe you ought to give (or sell cheaply) your fellow "databasix goon" Gary
Burnore the clue that if he's going to call an alleged "spammer" on the phone 
at 2 AM and ream him about a Usenet post, that he shouldn't brag about it 
publicly.

And yet he did exactly that.  Would it be any wonder if people were to
start suspecting that he might have done the same thing again?

Now go subpoena those phone records.  You might want to concentrate on calls
made from the Raleigh-Durham, NC area.  If you're alluding to the fact that 
Ron Guilmette may have been responsible, since the disinformation team at
DataBasix has accused him practically everything else, you have about as
much chance of proving that as O.J. Simpson does of "finding the real 
killers".

> Good job NANAE.  You really fucked up royally.

One could conceivably substitute "DataBasix" for "NANAE" in that flame.

--