1997-11-12 - Bug Bounty: Disappearing Cryptography…

Header Data

From: Peter Wayner <pcw@access.digex.net>
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Message Hash: e5366f0227462e0df8aa700ca340f9d742f753e3129ff6632aeccd6a0b941876
Message ID: <v03102840b08e3595d3ba@[199.125.128.5]>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1997-11-12 00:51:02 UTC
Raw Date: Wed, 12 Nov 1997 08:51:02 +0800

Raw message

From: Peter Wayner <pcw@access.digex.net>
Date: Wed, 12 Nov 1997 08:51:02 +0800
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Subject: Bug Bounty: Disappearing Cryptography...
Message-ID: <v03102840b08e3595d3ba@[199.125.128.5]>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain




My publisher is preparing to reprint my book _Disappearing
Cryptography_. As part of a general maintence scheme, I'm
offering a reward of $10.00 for the first person to discover a
technical error found in the book. Find as many as you can and
win some cash.


Naturally, there are some limitations to the offer:

* Only the first person to report an error is eligible for the
reward. The final decision in the case of a tie, will be up to
me. The ties will be broken using the time my SMTP server
(access.digex.net) receives the mail. I reserve the right to
give out multiple rewards in the case of a tie or a close
finish. In fact, I'll aim to do this. I just don't want the
situtation to emerge where everyone can send me the same bug
report and feel eligible for a reward.

* Some multiple errors may only count once. Imagine that the
third page was missing from the book. Technically, all following
pages would be misnumbered. I reserve the right to group any
collection of bugs together and label them one error. I will use
this right judiciously to avoid hair splitting arguments, but
not to deny people multiple rewards. The more errors that are
fixed, the better.

* Grammar errors aren't eligible, but I welcome any comments.
These disputes are often more issues of taste than rule.

-Peter Wayner







Thread