From: Ryan Anderson <ryan@michonline.com>
Date: Wed, 12 Nov 1997 00:13:19 +0800
To: jbaber@mi.leeds.ac.uk
Subject: Re: Bell vs. Woodward--justice?
In-Reply-To: <2278.9711111011@misun2.mi.leeds.ac.uk>
Message-ID: <Pine.GSO.3.95.971111110228.19211D-100000@king>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain



On Tue, 11 Nov 1997 jbaber@mi.leeds.ac.uk wrote:

> Leaving aside the problem with a system where a judge can overturn the 
> decision of a Jury (I have not seen all of the evidence so have no idea
> if she is guilty or innocent but if you enter a country you implicitly
> agree to abide by their laws and legal system, however what is the point
> of having a Jury if the Judge can do this sort of thing?) then the actual

My understanding of the system used in Massachusets is that the judge in a
trial there can overturn a conviction.  the judge can't overturn an
aquittal.

This is good for the defendent.  It's one more way to be freed.  

Ryan Anderson - Alpha Geek
PGP fp: 7E 8E C6 54 96 AC D9 57  E4 F8 AE 9C 10 7E 78 C9
print pack"C*",split/\D+/,`echo "16iII*o\U@{$/=$z;[(pop,pop,unpack"H*",<>
)]}\EsMsKsN0[lN*1lK[d2%Sa2/d0<X+d*lMLa^*lN%0]dsXx++lMlN/dsM0<J]dsJxp"|dc`