1997-11-26 - Re: Quoting Portions of a Signed Document

Header Data

From: “William H. Geiger III” <whgiii@invweb.net>
To: cypherpunks@Algebra.COM
Message Hash: e9a90b16e59f217160f698d9650add715f6ac8e35ea33f24617ac3b68172c280
Message ID: <199711260102.UAA25089@users.invweb.net>
Reply To: <199711260002.BAA28863@basement.replay.com>
UTC Datetime: 1997-11-26 01:10:01 UTC
Raw Date: Wed, 26 Nov 1997 09:10:01 +0800

Raw message

From: "William H. Geiger III" <whgiii@invweb.net>
Date: Wed, 26 Nov 1997 09:10:01 +0800
To: cypherpunks@Algebra.COM
Subject: Re: Quoting Portions of a Signed Document
In-Reply-To: <199711260002.BAA28863@basement.replay.com>
Message-ID: <199711260102.UAA25089@users.invweb.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain



-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----

In <199711260002.BAA28863@basement.replay.com>, on 11/25/97 
   at 07:02 PM, nobody@REPLAY.COM (Anonymous) said:

>It would be nifty if there was a way to show that any continuous set of
>bits were signed given only one signature on a whole document.
>Intuitively, it seems to me that this might be provably inconsistent with
>a secure hash.  Still, crypto results are full of surprises, so I could
>imagine there is a way to do this.

Well you can do it. Wether you want to do it is another matter.

For the level of granularity you are sugesting a hash is not pratical.

You could just use RSA encryption to encrypt the message in the following
manner:

The user encrypts the message with his *private* key. Rather than
encrypting the entire document in one operation he would encrypt each
[insert you level of granularity here] and then concantinate the results.
Say we wanted a level of granularity of a word:

word1 word2 word3 word4

the resulting cypher text would be:

cypher1 cypher2 cypher3 cypher4

Now if someone wished to verifiably quote words 1,3,4 they would include
cypher1 cypher3 cypher4 in their document.

Since cypher 1,3,4 could only be generated by original author it can be
verified that he actually wrote those words.

At a bare minimum this would have to be done on a level of granularity of
a sentance to have any meaning at all and even then it's relavance would
be questioned.


- -- 
- ---------------------------------------------------------------
William H. Geiger III  http://users.invweb.net/~whgiii
Geiger Consulting    Cooking With Warp 4.0

Author of E-Secure - PGP Front End for MR/2 Ice
PGP & MR/2 the only way for secure e-mail.
OS/2 PGP 2.6.3a at: http://users.invweb.net/~whgiii/pgpmr2.html                        
- ---------------------------------------------------------------

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: 2.6.3a
Charset: cp850
Comment: Registered_User_E-Secure_v1.1b1_ES000000

iQCVAwUBNHt00o9Co1n+aLhhAQHrKwP/SfQYrH07AA1WxJa/atnYfrnlkORgsevK
eO0EDDBcz3XIwBWP43y1l8XqRcK0F5sLjdQ6L0s8t9CmqH4N00awfM8UlN7bm69s
9AGuJwA1/UanfOi6TDXclvKJYgMCRerP0X+Yvr04gePObITYOrMKZUbDdYnO/70Y
2EpPAbaPcg4=
=5HsX
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----






Thread