From: nobody@REPLAY.COM (Anonymous)
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Message Hash: f9d2ac35ed928e9bc974566e8854f562f657d98a73649a2c4f3de606594b203d
Message ID: <199711190457.FAA13446@basement.replay.com>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1997-11-19 05:18:18 UTC
Raw Date: Wed, 19 Nov 1997 13:18:18 +0800
From: nobody@REPLAY.COM (Anonymous)
Date: Wed, 19 Nov 1997 13:18:18 +0800
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Subject: Is Tim May a 'felon' under these laws? / Re: Banned smells
Message-ID: <199711190457.FAA13446@basement.replay.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Tim May wrote:
> At 7:51 PM -0700 11/18/97, TruthMonger wrote:
> >Having judges, or government officials, go sniff the feedlot apparently
> >would give insufficient due process of law; rather, a panel of
> >sniffers will develop objective standards on the types of odors and
> >their strength.
> Here in the People's Republic of Kalifornia, some areas have
> been declared "fragrance free." It's a crime to enter these fragrance-free
> zones with banned smells.
This would explain the cancellation of all flights between DC and
Kalifornia.
Why didn't Tim May perform a 'citizen's arrest' in Stanford? Failure
of nerve, or offsetting penalties? (Punt, Tim, punt!)
NotThatI'mATroubleMakerMonger
Return to November 1997
Return to “nobody@REPLAY.COM (Anonymous)”
1997-11-19 (Wed, 19 Nov 1997 13:18:18 +0800) - Is Tim May a ‘felon’ under these laws? / Re: Banned smells - nobody@REPLAY.COM (Anonymous)