From: Anonymous <Use-Author-Address-Header@[127.1]>
Date: Sun, 30 Nov 1997 19:12:33 +0800
To: mail2news@basement.replay.com
Subject: Re: Another Anti-Privacy Bigot Heard From (was: The Guilmette/Burnore deba
In-Reply-To: <slrn67eevb.fjb.sjsobol@devel.nacs.net>
Message-ID: <ec245f85c0797976e6237c8c77306649@anonymous.poster>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain



gburnore@netcom.com (Gary L. Burnore) wrote:

> On Sun, 30 Nov 1997 03:48:14 GMT, eridani+spam@netcom.com wrote:
> 
> : In article <c87feca75aa95fb3e51fe7ad0c72f17d@anonymous.poster>,
> : Anonymous <Use-Author-Address-Header@[127.1]>  wrote:
> : [same ole same ole]
> : 
> : Gary said THE anon asshole.  That's you, bubba.  Your writing style and
> : your tiresome beating of the same old drum give you away every time.  
> : 
> : Don't try to make this into Gary L. Burnore (and me, of course, don't
> : forget me) against everyone who posts anonymously.  It wasn't that way
> : from the start and it ain't that way now.  This is about YOU and the
> : smear campaign that YOU conduct from behind an anonymous remailer.
> 
> The anonasshole is now working on his "way out of this".  Expect many more of
> his posts to contain bits of how more than one person posting anonymously is
> making the accusations.   All is falling down around the anonasshole. 
>  
> : <cue more lies and distortions from THE anon cretin>
> 
> We'd expect no less.  I do wonder how long it will take before those who
> believe remailers are a good thing start to realise this asshole has it in for
> them.  Everything it posts could be used by the anti-remailer front as a
> reason to shut them all down.
> 
> 
>          gburnore@netcom dot com   or  gburnore@netcom databasix com          
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
>                   How you look depends on where you go.
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Gary L. Burnore                       |  ÝÛ³ºÝ³Þ³ºÝ³³Ýۺݳ޳ºÝ³Ý³Þ³ºÝ³ÝÝÛ³
>                                       |  ÝÛ³ºÝ³Þ³ºÝ³³Ýۺݳ޳ºÝ³Ý³Þ³ºÝ³ÝÝÛ³
> DOH!                                  |  ÝÛ³ºÝ³Þ³ºÝ³³Ýۺݳ޳ºÝ³Ý³Þ³ºÝ³ÝÝÛ³
>                                       |  ÝÛ³ 3 4 1 4 2  ݳ޳ 6 9 0 6 9 ÝÛ³
> spamgard(tm):  zamboni                |     Official Proof of Purchase
> ===========================================================================
>              PGPprint: C63B CF4E 1B71 4D7E C6F8 AF4E 338D 5CB4
>     KeyID: 0x0F7EDBD9 (RSA)     finger gburnore@netcom.com for public key
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------

That was an impressive tantrum that you and Belinda just staged.  I
suppose you thought it would distract attention from the fact that
you still refuse to reveal what your motive was for harassing Jeff
Burchell this summer in a failed attempt to get him to turn over the
logs containing the names and e-mail addresses of everyone who
either sent or received an anonymous message through his remailer.

Your attempt to spread F.U.D. (fear, uncertainty, and doubt) among
the remailer user community is reminiscent of the "Church" of
$cientology's similarly rabid anti-remailer tactics.  Your fanciful
posts about "anonymous assholes", "cyber stalkers", and other bovine
excrement don't even make good fiction anymore.  I'll take ElRon's
sci-fi over yours any day.

If posts from "anon assholes" really offend your sensitive feelings,
then you might want to stay away from most of the NGs where you've
been posting your blather.  SUGGESTION: stick with "safe" groups
like comp.org.cauce where anonymous posts are banned and content is
censo^h^h^h^h^hmoderated to ensure an appropriate level of political
correctness.