1997-12-17 - Re: Comparing PGP to Symantec’s Secret Stuff

Header Data

From: Bill Frantz <frantz@netcom.com>
To: Vin McLellan <cypherpunks@Algebra.COM
Message Hash: 0ebbe66f9ca365041e2875540300817407c9fc9da23388d1a772de622950cc8b
Message ID: <v03110742b0bd0b7aae35@[207.94.249.114]>
Reply To: <v03007800b0bc0c9a7689@[198.115.179.81]>
UTC Datetime: 1997-12-17 05:54:42 UTC
Raw Date: Wed, 17 Dec 1997 13:54:42 +0800

Raw message

From: Bill Frantz <frantz@netcom.com>
Date: Wed, 17 Dec 1997 13:54:42 +0800
To: Vin McLellan <cypherpunks@Algebra.COM
Subject: Re: Comparing PGP to Symantec's Secret Stuff
In-Reply-To: <v03007800b0bc0c9a7689@[198.115.179.81]>
Message-ID: <v03110742b0bd0b7aae35@[207.94.249.114]>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain



At 3:01 AM -0800 12/16/97, Vin McLellan wrote:
>   Norton Secret Stuff secures the data using the 32-bit Blowfish
>encryption algorithm -- which is why it's approved for unrestricted export
>outside the US by the U.S. government.

This is the first I've heard of a Blowfish based produce being approved for
export.  Since Blowfish has about 9 bits worth of protection against brute
force searches in its key schedule, this is about a 41 bit approval.  Does
anyone know of an export permit for a version of Blowfish with a key longer
than 32 bits?


-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Bill Frantz       | One party wants to control | Periwinkle -- Consulting
(408)356-8506     | what you do in the bedroom,| 16345 Englewood Ave.
frantz@netcom.com | the other in the boardroom.| Los Gatos, CA 95032, USA







Thread