From: wayne clerke <wclerke@emirates.net.ae>
Date: Wed, 31 Dec 1997 05:40:07 +0800
To: "'cypherpunks@rigel.cyberpass.net>
Subject: RE: Anonymous IRC (was "Cypherpunks IRC Christmas Eve Party")
Message-ID: <01BD158C.4FCF91D0@wclerke@emirates.net.ae>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain



On Tuesday, December 30, 1997 7:56 AM, Mark Hedges [SMTP:hedges@rigel.cyberpass.net] wrote:
> 
> 
> We found IRC users to be so involved in petty information wars --
> ping floods, malicious prank hacking, and the like -- that we directed
> policy against use of IRC from the anonymous shell accounts at CyberPass.
> 
> If IRC users weren't so easily lulled by the tempation to crash a server
> or run malicious bots or just plain irritate other people for fun, and
> if they would gang up and kick out people who did that, then perhaps we'd
> switch that back on.
> 
> They were just too much overhead. Everyone else seems pretty nice, really,
> as far as the system goes. They're all self-interested in keeping the
> anonymous publishing and so on going, so the peace keeps itself.


What's the reason behind the policy direction against the use of personal web proxies running in a (paid for) shell account? 
Seems like less risk than you already accept anyway. Something I've missed?

> 
> Mark Hedges
> Infonex and Anonymizer
> 
> 


Mail: <a href= mailto:wclerke@emirates.net.ae >Wayne Clerke</a>
PGP key id: AEB2546D  F/P: D663D11EDA19D74F5032DC7EE001B702
PGP key id: 57AA1C10  F/P: 9926BF8918B7EB3623A7 AFA46572C5B857AA1C10
PGP mail welcome.			Voice: +971 506 43 4853
If you're not living on the edge, you're taking up too much space.