From: jkthomson <jkthomson@bigfoot.com>
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Message Hash: 27e68e094110985b1b6685dd8add15b0d52c861c1001ae1215d7d8c8a98e1b79
Message ID: <3.0.3.32.19971226005032.007517d4@dowco.com>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1997-12-26 08:57:14 UTC
Raw Date: Fri, 26 Dec 1997 16:57:14 +0800
From: jkthomson <jkthomson@bigfoot.com>
Date: Fri, 26 Dec 1997 16:57:14 +0800
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Subject: actual, on-topic post (tm)
Message-ID: <3.0.3.32.19971226005032.007517d4@dowco.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
does a large number of 'bounces' between randomly selected remailers
increase security/untraceability? what if you made each message go through
ALL remailers, or nearly all?
be gentle... I'm just a lurker.
--------------------------------------------------------
james keith thomson <jkthomson@bigfoot.com> ICQ:746241
PGP 263i keysig: 85C6 F156 5F8E 1457 F613 AA3A 5E69 E873
public keys availible at <pgp.mit.edu>
--------------------------------------------------------
The Whispered Rule:
People will believe anything if you whisper it.
========================================================
Return to December 1997
Return to “jkthomson <jkthomson@bigfoot.com>”
1997-12-26 (Fri, 26 Dec 1997 16:57:14 +0800) - actual, on-topic post (tm) - jkthomson <jkthomson@bigfoot.com>