1997-12-19 - Re: Censorware Search Engine update and request for files

Header Data

From: mj@creative.net
To: Declan McCullagh <declan@well.com>
Message Hash: 2c1cfe7ba02f534928219ceb00ff2d3f7b9bd5ce647caa214670675ad61b6613
Message ID: <v04002a01b0bf1fe04bc6@[207.137.201.7]>
Reply To: <199712182329.SAA05550@users.invweb.net>
UTC Datetime: 1997-12-19 03:49:17 UTC
Raw Date: Fri, 19 Dec 1997 11:49:17 +0800

Raw message

From: mj@creative.net
Date: Fri, 19 Dec 1997 11:49:17 +0800
To: Declan McCullagh <declan@well.com>
Subject: Re: Censorware Search Engine update and request for files
In-Reply-To: <199712182329.SAA05550@users.invweb.net>
Message-ID: <v04002a01b0bf1fe04bc6@[207.137.201.7]>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain



One comment in this article:

>  http://cgi.pathfinder.com/netly/editorial/0,1012,453,00.html
>
 may be incorrect. The comment is:


>    I have one major objection to all of the
>                   software filters currently on the market: Consumers
>                     have no way of knowing what's being blocked.
>                     Without knowing what's on the filter list, parents
>                     can't know what Junior will or won't be seeing.

 NetNanny (www.netnanny.com) says that its lists are fully viewable and
editable.  If so, perhaps we should support them as the alternative.







Thread