From: damaged justice <frogfarm@yakko.cs.wmich.edu>
To: cypherpunks@Algebra.COM
Message Hash: 44511579db6fd9cdb2411f9f75a21bc506cc2977ebca1e35ab85c223c8c96497
Message ID: <199712291845.NAA15134@yakko.cs.wmich.edu>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1997-12-29 18:44:14 UTC
Raw Date: Tue, 30 Dec 1997 02:44:14 +0800
From: damaged justice <frogfarm@yakko.cs.wmich.edu>
Date: Tue, 30 Dec 1997 02:44:14 +0800
To: cypherpunks@Algebra.COM
Subject: newscolumn1.html
Message-ID: <199712291845.NAA15134@yakko.cs.wmich.edu>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
[1]Microsoft Small Business [2]Business First [3]Kemper Insurance
Companies
[4][ISMAP]-[5][USEMAP]
December 29, 1997
Tech Watch
Groups line up in support for Internet commerce taxes
______________________________________________________________
John Frees
Rumblings on the horizon suggest that tax-free Internet commerce
could be coming to an end.
State governments, already losing as much as $3 billion annually in
taxes on direct-mail purchases, are taking a strong look at the
growing market for online purchases.
The Federation of Tax Administrators, the National Conference of
State Legislatures, National League of Cities and the National
Governors' Association all want Congress to let states tax such
purchases.
But problems involved in deciding how states could collect those
taxes could delay any foreseeable solution.
Advocacy groups favoring the collection have created an electronic
commerce project to decide how states can obtain their share of
taxes.
But even advocates have wide differences of opinion, says Harley
Duncan, executive director of Washington D.C.-based Federation of
Tax Administrators.
"People in the project run the gamut from those who want to apply
taxes responsibly to everyone to those who argue that electronic
commerce deserve special consideration, while others say we ought
to say it should be treated the same as mail order," he says.
There are some similarities -- and some differences -- between mail
order and Internet commerce, says tax attorney Harvey Dunn of law
firm Schottenstein Zox & Dunn. If a company has some presence in
Ohio, say a store or a trucking company, then sales tax could be
charged. But an out-of-state mail-order company that ships a
product via common carrier doesn't have to charge sales tax.
However, buyers should pay a "use tax" on items once they receive
them, he says. "But no one does," Dunn says.
Cars bought out of state are charged a use tax because they are
titled, which gives the state control.
The difficulty comes in determining how to collect such a tax, says
Julie Carpenter, spokeswoman for the Ohio Department of Taxation.
Right now, there's no way for the state to police all the goods
that are bought elsewhere but used here.
"An Ohio taxpayer's obligation is to pay the tax," she says.
"Realistically, is this going to happen? Probably not, without
guidelines and some oversight."
Online purchases are even murkier because the Net's unique nature
allows some products such as music, software or electronic
magazines, to be downloaded, Duncan says.
While a CD purchased in a store can be taxed, how can a government
collect on a few megabytes sent over the Internet?
The electronic commerce project is looking at a billing address
approach, Duncan says. If the commerce terminates in a state and is
billed to someone in that state, then that state could make a
strong case for collecting taxes on the commerce.
Another issue states face is the different taxation rates among
states. If a product made in New Hampshire is sold online to
someone in Ohio, should Ohio collect a sales tax even though New
Hampshire doesn't have a state sales tax? And how should sales from
other countries be factored?
Because of these and other issues, Duncan doesn't expect project
members to have a grasp of the issue until sometime next summer.
Meanwhile, Everen Securities estimates general, apparel, furniture
and other sales nationwide are expected to hit $795 billion by
2000.
As much as $79 billion of that will be sold online. At an average
sales tax of 5 percent, nearly $4 billion in taxes will go
uncollected unless the states can convince the federal government
to figure out a way to give them a share.
Got a tip for Tech Watch? Reach reporter John Frees at
columbus@amcity.com or by phone at 461-4040, ext. 143.
(c) 1997, Business First
[6]More News Columns
References
1. http://www.microsoft.com/smallbiz
2. http://www.amcity.com/columbus/
3. http://www.KemperInsurance.com/
4. http://www.amcity.com/columbus/maps/new_topbar.map
5. LYNXIMGMAP:http://www.amcity.com/columbus/stories/current/newscolumn1.html#topbar
6. http://www.amcity.com/columbus/stories/current/newscolumns.html
Return to December 1997
Return to “Steve Schear <schear@lvdi.net>”