From: mj@creative.net
To: cypherpunks@cyberpass.net
Message Hash: 6a6dbf68c880a89dcf44888d9a6205ec6afb265bec25cfd19ef99b9503aacc8f
Message ID: <v04002a06b0bf7efdab5d@[207.137.201.12]>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1997-12-19 11:48:46 UTC
Raw Date: Fri, 19 Dec 1997 19:48:46 +0800
From: mj@creative.net
Date: Fri, 19 Dec 1997 19:48:46 +0800
To: cypherpunks@cyberpass.net
Subject: Fwd: Re: Is Unix dying--or even dead?
Message-ID: <v04002a06b0bf7efdab5d@[207.137.201.12]>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
>
>>
>>>>From Edupage, 18 December 1997:
>>>
>>><---------->
>>>TACTICAL SHIFT BY WORKSTATION COMPANIES
>>>Silicon Graphics Inc.'s plan to allow SGI graphics software to run on
>>>Microsoft's Windows NT operating system provides new evidence that a
>>>growing number of companies are giving up on Unix and instead
>>>standardizing on Windows NT. SGI hopes to be able to use its
>>>experience in developing high-end graphics software without having to
>>>spend a great deal of time building the underlying technology
>>>represented by an operating system. (Washington Post 17 Dec 97)
>>><---------->
>
>Fools. This will trap them into trying to compete with MS on its own
>platform, which is what's killing everyone else. What they should do is
>port to Linux, which should be much easier anyway, and give much better
>results, since they can customize the OS to their needs. Does anyone have
>any connections at SGI? I'm preparing a pro-Linux case based on my OOSI
>paper that I want to promote around Silicon Valley.
>>
>>
>
Return to December 1997
Return to “mj@creative.net”
1997-12-19 (Fri, 19 Dec 1997 19:48:46 +0800) - Fwd: Re: Is Unix dying–or even dead? - mj@creative.net