1997-12-19 - Is Unix dying–or even dead?
Header Data
From: “S. M. Halloran” <mitch@duzen.com.tr>
To: cypherpunks@cyberpass.net
Message Hash: 6bb7c66f1410f78396a7e40a3bd29592f57ef2f8f776c8c4e71f8ea997482741
Message ID: <199712190745.JAA17166@ankara.duzen.com.tr>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1997-12-19 07:59:54 UTC
Raw Date: Fri, 19 Dec 1997 15:59:54 +0800
Raw message
From: "S. M. Halloran" <mitch@duzen.com.tr>
Date: Fri, 19 Dec 1997 15:59:54 +0800
To: cypherpunks@cyberpass.net
Subject: Is Unix dying--or even dead?
Message-ID: <199712190745.JAA17166@ankara.duzen.com.tr>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
>From Edupage, 18 December 1997:
<---------->
TACTICAL SHIFT BY WORKSTATION COMPANIES
Silicon Graphics Inc.'s plan to allow SGI graphics software to run on
Microsoft's Windows NT operating system provides new evidence that a
growing number of companies are giving up on Unix and instead
standardizing on Windows NT. SGI hopes to be able to use its
experience in developing high-end graphics software without having to
spend a great deal of time building the underlying technology
represented by an operating system. (Washington Post 17 Dec 97)
<---------->
Thread
Return to December 1997
- Return to “Bill Stewart <bill.stewart@pobox.com>”
- Return to “phelix@vallnet.com”
Return to ““S. M. Halloran” <mitch@duzen.com.tr>”
- 1997-12-19 (Fri, 19 Dec 1997 15:59:54 +0800) - Is Unix dying–or even dead? - “S. M. Halloran” <mitch@duzen.com.tr>
- 1997-12-19 (Fri, 19 Dec 1997 20:19:09 +0800) - Re: Is Unix dying–or even dead? - phelix@vallnet.com
- 1997-12-20 (Sat, 20 Dec 1997 09:53:39 +0800) - Re: Is Unix dying–or even dead? - Bill Stewart <bill.stewart@pobox.com>