1997-12-19 - Re: Can I do Pubkic Domain that -

Header Data

From: David Honig <honig@otc.net>
To: Tim May <bd1011@hotmail.com>
Message Hash: 868a106a671bdcbac8109e7157d15e053c80323d4c52515d5010f1c73e7075e7
Message ID: <3.0.5.32.19971219084949.007bc9a0@otc.net>
Reply To: <3.0.5.32.19971218135434.007b3e00@otc.net>
UTC Datetime: 1997-12-19 18:24:59 UTC
Raw Date: Sat, 20 Dec 1997 02:24:59 +0800

Raw message

From: David Honig <honig@otc.net>
Date: Sat, 20 Dec 1997 02:24:59 +0800
To: Tim May <bd1011@hotmail.com>
Subject: Re: Can I do Pubkic Domain that -
In-Reply-To: <3.0.5.32.19971218135434.007b3e00@otc.net>
Message-ID: <3.0.5.32.19971219084949.007bc9a0@otc.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain



At 06:39 PM 12/18/97 -0700, Tim May wrote:
>At 2:54 PM -0700 12/18/97, David Honig wrote:
>
>>I was alluding to the licensing of ordinary photocopiers and fax machines
>>(and computers,
>>and now internet connections) in statist nations, to prevent their "misuse".
>>In the 50's, the government should have
>>(from the control point of view) used the hysteria of the times to regulate
>>*domestic* use of reprogrammable computers.
>
>Nope. The government of the United States had no authority in the 1950s to
>regulate fax machines (which existed then), mimeograph machines (which
>existed then), or computers (which existed then).
>
>Perhaps you were thinking of the Soviet Union?
>
>--Tim May


Soviets, China, etc.  I was being facetious.  I understand that our pesky
constitution
prevents certain government behaviors, but they're working to eliminate
that problem.

cheers


------------------------------------------------------------
      David Honig                   Orbit Technology
     honig@otc.net                  Intaanetto Jigyoubu

	M-16 : Don Quixote :: PGP : Louis Freeh
         Let freedom ring (or screech at 28.8)

















Thread