From: Jim Choate <ravage@ssz.com>
To: cypherpunks@ssz.com (Cypherpunks Distributed Remailer)
Message Hash: 9a9b7d62b55d04f3295b87331aabec630e86897e7ec3552caf58d1f36365de87
Message ID: <199712160540.XAA05167@einstein.ssz.com>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1997-12-16 05:24:53 UTC
Raw Date: Tue, 16 Dec 1997 13:24:53 +0800
From: Jim Choate <ravage@ssz.com>
Date: Tue, 16 Dec 1997 13:24:53 +0800
To: cypherpunks@ssz.com (Cypherpunks Distributed Remailer)
Subject: Re: Radio Free Cypherpunks... (fwd)
Message-ID: <199712160540.XAA05167@einstein.ssz.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text
Forwarded message:
> Date: Mon, 15 Dec 1997 15:49:40 -0800
> From: Steve Schear <schear@lvdi.net>
> Subject: Re: Radio Free Cypherpunks... (fwd)
>
> Over a year ago I started a heated thread on the Telecom Regulation list,=
> "Basis of FCC jurisdiction," which posited that the Commerce Clause basis=
> for FCC authority might not hold for very low power and tens of GHz=
> transmissions. My argument, in short, was that if a transmission couldn't=
> reasonably be expected to be detectable (using common receiver technology)=
> across state lines then the FCC shouldn't have jurisdition.
So, are you considering such a broadcast? What I envision is a
text-to-speech and/or a digital format.
____________________________________________________________________
| |
| |
| We built your fort. We will not have it used against us. |
| |
| John Wayne - Allegheny Uprising |
| |
| |
| _____ The Armadillo Group |
| ,::////;::-. Austin, Tx. USA |
| /:'///// ``::>/|/ http://www.ssz.com/ |
| .', |||| `/( e\ |
| -====~~mm-'`-```-mm --'- Jim Choate |
| ravage@ssz.com |
| 512-451-7087 |
|____________________________________________________________________|
Return to December 1997
Return to “Tim May <tcmay@got.net>”