1997-12-11 - RE: On Air

Header Data

From: Steve Schear <schear@lvdi.net>
To: cypherpunks@cyberpass.net
Message Hash: b2480692133d7a9b839d96dc832c1fde1e8996f9ae172c807614e7932ea337a0
Message ID: <v03102802b0b525e5c257@[208.129.55.202]>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1997-12-11 05:16:06 UTC
Raw Date: Thu, 11 Dec 1997 13:16:06 +0800

Raw message

From: Steve Schear <schear@lvdi.net>
Date: Thu, 11 Dec 1997 13:16:06 +0800
To: cypherpunks@cyberpass.net
Subject: RE: On Air
Message-ID: <v03102802b0b525e5c257@[208.129.55.202]>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain



>From: "Nightline, News           MS" <NITELINE@abc.com>
>To: "'SMTP:schear@lvdi.net'" <schear@lvdi.net>
>Subject: RE: On Air
>Date: Wed, 10 Dec 1997 13:32:00 -0500
>X-Priority: 3
>MIME-Version: 1.0
>
>ÐÏࡱ
>
>
>====== Your Original Letter Follows =====
>
>
>
>_browser = Mozilla/4.01 (Macintosh; I; PPC)
>_script = http://www.abcnews.com/onair/email.html
>>from = schear@lvdi.net
>last_name = Schear
>subj = On Air
>first_name = Steve
>Question = Re: Dec 8, Revolution in a Box, Part 11
>
>The number trotted out on your show of 100,000 penetrations, or
>attempted penetrations, of Pentagon computers as an indication of poor
>security is misleading.  If you had taken the time to dig behind these
>numbers you would have found that most all of these intrusions, or
>attempts, were against DoD computer systems connected to public networks
>(e.g., Web sites) containing no secret information and with minimal
>security provisions.
>
>100,000 certainly sounds like a major problem.  Suggest you check you
>facts first, next time and scale your numbers appropriately.
>
>Steve Schear
>CEO
>First ECache Corp.
>_cookie = SWID=4E29F2F7-710A-11D1-82AF-00A0C921A5DB
>_time = 12/09/97 19:47:40
>_ipaddress = 208.129.55.202
>_user = - - schear@lvdi.net
>







Thread